Watching this thread for a long time now, and I must say I absolutely love how
someone just barges in «oh just add parsing of C++ AST».
C++ is a language with an extremely complex context-dependent grammar, much
more so than C. Not to mention they took to updating the standard with new
awesome f
>
> > I have another idea/iteration to run by you then. One of your chief
> > quibbles, although I don't think it's your underlying one, is Cython must
> > understand what's going on. So how about we support a block of C/C++
> code
> > as a proper construct. Same name but now, I guess braces may
Just trying and improve the state of the art. Yea maybe we have to add
some tricks to separate the two grammar wise, so they can play together.
Besides, I didn't start with that complexity, it evolved into seeing if
that was a viable path forward.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Alex S. wrote:
