On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Manuel Nuno Melo
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> Please post your solution; I'm curious to see it.
Will do in a bit. I need to see if I can distill it somewhat from its
original context so that it can be better understood.
> Currently, we're also using setup_requires but are
Ah, sorry Erik, you're absolutely right. I mixed my results a bit and must
elaborate:
'setup_requires' on its own will indeed not generate the behavior I
described.
However, if you define the same dependency under 'setup_requires' AND
'install_requires', then you get the mess I mentioned. Essenti
