Hi,
I came across the following bug, while trying to implement iterator
versions of std::string members, for which a simple reproducer is below.
If the return type of a function is a normal type, then everything is
fine, but if it's a pointer or reference type, then Cython refuses to
compile
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
If the return type of a function is a normal type, then everything is
fine, but if it's a pointer or reference type, then Cython refuses to
compile it.
I've just found out that apparently this happens because Cython misparses
function definition as
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
Hope that helps to fix the problem for good though!
Apparently a separate, but related bug: when C++ class constructor is
templated, Cython fails to compile the code.
However, if I specify a return type (irrespectively of what type is), it
seems
