Hi!
None of the core developers uses MSVC, so we generally rely on Windows
users to do their own testing and provide fixes.
Hogan, Christopher schrieb am 30.09.2015 um 00:03:
> I was trying to compile numpy v1.9.2 with Visual Studio 2008 and Cython
> 0.23.1. This worked fine with Cython 0.22.x,
Hi,
On 9/30/2015 12:13 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi!
None of the core developers uses MSVC, so we generally rely on Windows
users to do their own testing and provide fixes.
Hogan, Christopher schrieb am 30.09.2015 um 00:03:
I was trying to compile numpy v1.9.2 with Visual Studio 2008 and Cytho
Ian Henriksen schrieb am 29.07.2015 um 23:56:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Ian Henriksen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:36 AM Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Ian Henriksen wrote:
> I've spent a
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 30.09.2015 um 09:13:
> Hogan, Christopher schrieb am 30.09.2015 um 00:03:
>> I was trying to compile numpy v1.9.2 with Visual Studio 2008 and Cython
>> 0.23.1. This worked fine with Cython 0.22.x, but in 0.23.1 there are
>> some changes in Cython/Utility/TypeConversion.c t
> So, what you are saying is that VS-2008 is not C99 standards compliant (what
> a surprise) but claims to be?
> Are you passing any C compiler flags that requests C99 compliance?
We have to use the flag /Qstd=c99. I guess it's more a Microsoft problem than
anything.
> To me, your proposed ch
>
> I'd like to see this feature merged rather sooner than later. Would it help
> if we only require a type to be there (so that people get the syntax right
> in their code) but do not validate it for now?
>
> Stefan
>
>
Stefan,
Sorry for the delay, I've been mulling over what to do about this and
