Thanks for reply @Sturla.
1) Sturla>>> Originally Fortran's "implicit none".
Zaxebo>> Yes, you are right :-)
---
2) Sturla>>>
I am not sure why you use Python (including Cython) if you prefer to turn
off duck typing, though. You kn
ooops,following line in my earlier email:
"We are still using datatype."
should be read as:
"We are still using duck datatyping."
Zaxebo1
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
Zaxebo Yaxebo wrote:
>
> Zaxebo>>
> I am NOT saying to implement datatyping(that is already part of cython by
> "cdef int","cdef double"). I am NOT saying to turn off duck typing.
> What i am requesting is: declaration of variables without data
> typing (like: cdef "var" ). And "opti
Sturla>>> Ok, so it is to guard against spelling errors?
Yes, thats a real big problem, once .
Others are sufferring from this too, as i mentioned in my original post
Here are other people also requesting the similar thing:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/613364/is-there-a-need-for-a-use-stri
Zaxebo Yaxebo schrieb am 05.11.2014 um 19:35:
> Sturla>>> Ok, so it is to guard against spelling errors?
>
> Yes, thats a real big problem, once .
>
> Others are sufferring from this too, as i mentioned in my original post
>
> Here are other people also requesting the similar thing:
> http://sta
Stefan>>> A directive, see Options.py. There are already two directives
called "warn.undeclared" and "infer_types.verbose". Combining those should
get close to what you are looking for.
Zaxebo1>> thanks. it works as i wished. You are really really my saviour.
===
Now only thing le
Zaxebo Yaxebo schrieb am 06.11.2014 um 02:35:
> Stefan>>> A directive, see Options.py. There are already two directives
> called "warn.undeclared" and "infer_types.verbose". Combining those should
> get close to what you are looking for.
>
> Zaxebo1>> thanks. it works as i wished. You are reall
I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
types, namelye
type0 (*[ident])(type1, type2, type3)
would instead become
(type1, type2, type3) -> type0 [ident]
I have a pull request up at https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/333;
what do people think?
- Robert
___
