[Cython] releasing 0.18?

2012-12-15 Thread Stefan Behnel
Hi, the current master doesn't really have the one new, great&shiny feature, but I don't see a reason to keep the changes back that we have implemented so far. Robert's const support and the integer overflow checks (assuming that both are ready) are certainly worth it. Unless Mark's minivect chang

Re: [Cython] Cython is not PEP-420 (Implicit Namespace Packages) compliant

2012-12-15 Thread Alexey V Gorshkov
Stefan Behnel wrote: Alexey V Gorshkov, 15.12.2012 02:17: Reporting about Cython PEP-420 (Implicit Namespace Packages) incompliance. (Sample package setup attached) (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/) Next package's tree will not work and will return error [...] I'm sure it's not - th

Re: [Cython] releasing 0.18?

2012-12-15 Thread mark florisson
On 15 December 2012 17:34, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Hi, > > the current master doesn't really have the one new, great&shiny feature, > but I don't see a reason to keep the changes back that we have implemented > so far. Robert's const support and the integer overflow checks (assuming > that both are