Hi,
I enabled HTML coverage report generation for the test suite. It's now
available from the "HTML Coverage Reports" link of the coverage job:
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-tests-py27-coverage/doclinks/1/
From a quick look, the test coverage seems not too bad
On 26 April 2011 20:05, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:18 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 26 April 2011 16:43, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 26.04.2011 16:23:
I've been working a bit on fused types
(http://wiki.cython.org/enhancements/fusedtypes),
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 21:48:
I'm currently wondering about the proposed
cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type
name, and not the type itself. So I think it would be inconsistent to
suddenly start allowing comparison with 'is' and 'isinstance' and
such.
I'm al
On 28 April 2011 21:58, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 28.04.2011 21:48:
>>
>> I'm currently wondering about the proposed
>> cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type
>> name, and not the type itself. So I think it would be inconsistent to
>> suddenly start all
On 28 April 2011 22:10, mark florisson wrote:
> On 28 April 2011 21:58, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 28.04.2011 21:48:
>>>
>>> I'm currently wondering about the proposed
>>> cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type
>>> name, and not the type itself. So I t
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> So I fixed all that, but I'm currently wondering about the proposed
> cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type
> name, and not the type itself.
Yes. This is just because there's not really anything better to
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>
>> So I fixed all that, but I'm currently wondering about the proposed
>> cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type
>> name, and not the type itself.
>
> Yes.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 27.04.2011 22:41:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Mad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>> i just read, that generators are supported in cython 0.15 - great news
>>> and brw, manny thanks. but is it somehow possible to use the
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
> On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So I fixed all that, but I'm currently wondering about the proposed
>>> cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string wit
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So I fixed all that, but I'm currently wondering about the proposed
>>> cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a s
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:29 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
>>>
So I fixed all that, but I'm currently wondering about the proposed
>
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
So I fixed all that, but I'm currently wondering about the proposed
cython.typeof(). I believe it currently re
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
>>
>> On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
> So I fixed all that, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
