On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:36:48PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > its bearable, and it's just automake. manually created makefiles are not
> > affected. why does cython use .pyx for two different things? what would
> > be the canonical extension for C++ cython files? i've chosen to use .pyxx,
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:39:45AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> > the only thing that will affect the user (and which i should mention)
>> > is: make uses file extensions to determine file types. particularly, i
>> > have not found a port
Felix Salfelder, 23.07.2013 11:25:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:39:45AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Even writing a correct makefile requires a huge amount of digging into
>> distutils.
>
> makefiles are documented in the make manual of your favourite make
> implementation. I don't know why you
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:39:45AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > the only thing that will affect the user (and which i should mention)
> > is: make uses file extensions to determine file types. particularly, i
> > have not found a portable hack that allows the use of .pyx for both .c
> > and .cpp
Felix Salfelder, 27.06.2013 23:06:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> Building Python extensions with makefiles/autotools rather than
>> distutils is less supported, but I suppose you could do that manually.
>
> i've done that. I ran into a few peculiarities with
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Building Python extensions with makefiles/autotools rather than
> distutils is less supported, but I suppose you could do that manually.
i've done that. I ran into a few peculiarities with "-I", "-w", and
__init__.py, but nothing s
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> Hi Robert.
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:05:48AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> And you're planning on calling cython manually, cutting distutils out
>> of the loop completely?
>
> If someone tells me, how to fix distutils, (better: doe
Hi Robert.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:05:48AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> And you're planning on calling cython manually, cutting distutils out
> of the loop completely?
If someone tells me, how to fix distutils, (better: does it), i might
change my mind. also, I need VPATH... just something
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:23:21AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> > explicit dependency tracking would imply "manual". which is painful and
>> > error-prone. without running gcc -M (with all flags) you cannot even
>> > guess the headers
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:23:21AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > explicit dependency tracking would imply "manual". which is painful and
> > error-prone. without running gcc -M (with all flags) you cannot even
> > guess the headers used transitively. I haven't found a gcc -M call
> > within the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> Hi Stefan.
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:58:28AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Make doesn't know that either. Cython at least knows which ones are used
>> directly. Handling transitive dependencies would require parsing header
>> files. I
Hi Stefan.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:58:28AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Make doesn't know that either. Cython at least knows which ones are used
> directly. Handling transitive dependencies would require parsing header
> files. If you need to keep track of changes in transitively included head
Felix Salfelder, 25.06.2013 10:34:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:06:35AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> I'm still, however, trying to figure out exactly what the usecase for
>> this is.
>
> it's about keeping track of build dependencies.
>
>> Generally extensions are created with distutils, and
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:06:35AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> One first comment, I think it's a lot to reserve three flags for this.
> Perhaps "-M [filename] would be sufficient, using the convention that
> - is stdout. If necessary, we could have a special syntax for the -D
> option.
it's a
We prefer changes as pull requests to https://github.com/cython/cython?
One first comment, I think it's a lot to reserve three flags for this.
Perhaps "-M [filename] would be sufficient, using the convention that
- is stdout. If necessary, we could have a special syntax for the -D
option.
I'm sti
15 matches
Mail list logo
