On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> > Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
>> BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why?
>
> you should use annotated -a (and/or signed -s,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
> BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why?
you should use annotated -a (and/or signed -s, which are annotated) tags
you do not use annotated tags:
$> git de
Bradley M. Froehle, 11.09.2012 00:34:
> Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why?
Stefan
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.pytho
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Release notes: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17
>
> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseHistory
> references only 0.16 for me
> ;-)
Fixed.
___
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Release notes: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseHistory
references only 0.16 for me
;-)
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore H
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> First, congratulations and thanks for keeping such an important
> project moving forward!!
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> What about making a 0.17 branch, on which we can do 0.17.1, etc. if
>> necessary. I
First, congratulations and thanks for keeping such an important
project moving forward!!
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> What about making a 0.17 branch, on which we can do 0.17.1, etc. if
> necessary. I don't think we're to the point of needing to backport our
> bugfi
Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
-Brad
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 09:17:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
I know this was brought up a co
Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 09:17:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
>>> I know this was brought up a couple of months ago, but we seem to be
>>> falling into a pattern of thinking about doing a bugfix release, then
>>> saying a full relea
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
>> Is there a plan to announce more broadly? (E.g. python-announce, if
>> you haven't already (moderation adds a bit of latency).)
>
> I had already sent it to the python-announce list and also made an
> ann
Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
> Is there a plan to announce more broadly? (E.g. python-announce, if
> you haven't already (moderation adds a bit of latency).)
I had already sent it to the python-announce list and also made an
announcement on c.l.py now. :)
> I know this was brought up a cou
11 matches
Mail list logo