Stefan Behnel, 01.05.2013 11:50:
> Nikita Nemkin, 26.04.2013 13:33:
>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:19:15 +0600, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>> Jumping into this thread late, improvements (1) and (3) certainly seem
>>> beneficial. As far as documenting "attributes," I can't see much of a
>>> use, but the
Nikita Nemkin, 26.04.2013 13:33:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:19:15 +0600, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>> Jumping into this thread late, improvements (1) and (3) certainly seem
>> beneficial. As far as documenting "attributes," I can't see much of a
>> use, but the downsides seem are low enough (accident
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:19:15 +0600, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
Jumping into this thread late, improvements (1) and (3) certainly seem
beneficial. As far as documenting "attributes," I can't see much of a
use, but the downsides seem are low enough (accidentally assigning a
stray string to the prev
Jumping into this thread late, improvements (1) and (3) certainly seem
beneficial. As far as documenting "attributes," I can't see much of a
use, but the downsides seem are low enough (accidentally assigning a
stray string to the previously declared attribute) and the
implementation non-invasive en
Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 16:44:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:41:56 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 12:43:
>>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:27:12 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> I did document them manually at first. It is ugly (function doc in one
>>> place, attribute doc in another
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:41:56 +0600, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 12:43:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:27:12 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I did document them manually at first. It is ugly (function doc in one
place,
attribute doc in another)
As it should be. The attributes are
Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 12:43:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:27:12 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 09:11:
>>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:11:21 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Separating property from the attribute requires mass renaming of
>>> the attribute (as was recently descus
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:27:12 +0600, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 09:11:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:11:21 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Separating property from the attribute requires mass renaming of
the attribute (as was recently descussed here) and bloating the code x4.
All thi
Nikita Nemkin, 20.04.2013 09:11:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:11:21 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Nikita Nemkin, 18.04.2013 07:07:
>>> 2) Public/readonly cdef attributes can have docstrings attached, using
>>> the [PEP 258 attribute docstring
>>> syntax](http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0258/#attrib
