Re: [Cython] pyregr test suite

2012-04-13 Thread Stefan Behnel
Stefan Behnel, 13.04.2012 07:11: > Robert Bradshaw, 12.04.2012 22:21: >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, mark florisson wrote: >>> Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically? >>> It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the >>> cython-devel branc

Re: [Cython] pyregr test suite

2012-04-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 12.04.2012 20:21: > Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically? > It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the > cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogged for hours, Careful here. It takes a lot of time, yes, but

Re: [Cython] pyregr test suite

2012-04-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 12.04.2012 22:21: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, mark florisson wrote: >> Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically? >> It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the >> cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogg

Re: [Cython] pyregr test suite

2012-04-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, mark florisson wrote: > Hey, > > Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically? > It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the > cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogged for hours, > making the con

[Cython] pyregr test suite

2012-04-12 Thread mark florisson
Hey, Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically? It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogged for hours, making the continuous development a lot less 'continuous'. We could just decide to