Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 23.07.2012 21:02: > Was this comment "Note that some > aspects of the memory views feature may not currently work in Python > 2.4.x. This is a known bug." in the release notes about the copying of > Python slice objects? Yes, about the failing tests. I removed it now. Stefan

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread mark florisson
On 23 July 2012 19:55, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 23.07.2012 20:07: >> On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: >> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merge

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 23.07.2012 20:07: > On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: >>> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: > Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? I was ok with it when

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 23.07.2012 20:38: > On 23 July 2012 19:07, mark florisson wrote: >> On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: I'll have to renew that pull request using the final rebase. I'll then rebase the rest of my working branch on master. >>>

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread mark florisson
On 23 July 2012 19:07, mark florisson wrote: > On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: >>> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: > Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? I was ok

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread mark florisson
On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: >> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? >>> >>> I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-23 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: > On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: >>> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? >> >> I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good to give it >> another pair of eyeballs, but apart f

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch

2012-07-17 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20: > On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: >>> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? >> >> I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good to give it >> another pair of eyeballs, but apart f

Re: [Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch (was: failing memory view tests in Python 2.4/5)

2012-07-17 Thread mark florisson
On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: >> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? > > I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good to give it > another pair of eyeballs, but apart from that, yes, I think it should go > in

[Cython] merging _refactor_indexnode branch (was: failing memory view tests in Python 2.4/5)

2012-07-17 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20: > Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release? I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good to give it another pair of eyeballs, but apart from that, yes, I think it should go in. I'll merge it as soon as Jenkins is happy with the te