On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:49 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>> - About pickling theano, we currently can't pick Theano function. It
>> could be made to work in some cases, but not for all cases as there is
>> hardware dependent optimization in the Theano
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 29 May 2012 23:29, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:22 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> I started a new project, https://github.com/markflorisson88/minivect ,
>>> which currently features a simple C code gener
On 29 May 2012 23:29, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:22 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> I started a new project, https://github.com/markflorisson88/minivect ,
>> which currently features a simple C code generator. The specializer
>> and astbuilder do most of the wor
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:22 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> I started a new project, https://github.com/markflorisson88/minivect ,
> which currently features a simple C code generator. The specializer
> and astbuilder do most of the work of creating the right AST, so the
> code genera
On 29 May 2012 23:22, mark florisson wrote:
> On 29 May 2012 22:26, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2012 13:52, mark florisson wrote:
On 28 May 2012 13:49, mark florisson wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien
On 29 May 2012 22:26, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 28 May 2012 13:52, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2012 13:49, mark florisson wrote:
On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry for the de
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 May 2012 13:52, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 28 May 2012 13:49, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, I had some schedule change.
thanks for add
On 28 May 2012 13:52, mark florisson wrote:
> On 28 May 2012 13:49, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay, I had some schedule change.
>>>
>>> thanks for adding me. Should I subscribe to cython-dev? How much email
>>> daily
On 28 May 2012 13:49, mark florisson wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, I had some schedule change.
>>
>> thanks for adding me. Should I subscribe to cython-dev? How much email
>> daily there is? I didn't found this on the archives. Fell fr
On 25 May 2012 21:53, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry for the delay, I had some schedule change.
>
> thanks for adding me. Should I subscribe to cython-dev? How much email
> daily there is? I didn't found this on the archives. Fell free to add
> me in CC again when you think it is approp
I just resended this email as it was rejected by the mailing list. So
I subscribed to it.
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, I had some schedule change.
thanks for adding me. Should I subscribe to cython-dev? How much email
daily there is? I didn't found this on the archives. Fell free to add
me in CC ag
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:16 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 22 May 2012 07:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrot
On 22 May 2012 07:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>
On 05/22/2012 09:06 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/22/2012 08:48 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 20
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 08:48 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre
On 05/22/2012 08:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/22/2012 08:48 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/20/2012 04:03
On 05/22/2012 08:48 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For my gsoc we
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For my gsoc we already have som
On 05/22/2012 08:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
arbitrary
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
>> elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
>> arbitrary rank), I don't think these need a
On 21 May 2012 12:14, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 12:56 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 21 May 2012 11:34, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i
On 05/21/2012 12:56 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 21 May 2012 11:34, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
arbitrary rank), I don
On 21 May 2012 12:08, mark florisson wrote:
> On 21 May 2012 11:34, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
>>> elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
>>>
On 21 May 2012 11:34, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
>> elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
>> arbitrary rank), I don't think these need any discussi
On 21 May 2012 11:34, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
>> elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
>> arbitrary rank), I don't think these need any discussi
On 05/20/2012 04:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
arbitrary rank), I don't think these need any discussion. However,
there are a lot of things that haven't been formally di
On 20 May 2012 15:03, mark florisson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
> elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
> arbitrary rank), I don't think these need any discussion. However,
> there are a lot of things that haven't been for
Hey,
For my gsoc we already have some simple initial ideas, i.e.
elementwise vector expressions (a + b with a and b arrays with
arbitrary rank), I don't think these need any discussion. However,
there are a lot of things that haven't been formally discussed on the
mailing list, so here goes.
Fréd
28 matches
Mail list logo
