On 23 October 2012 10:47, mark florisson wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 02:44, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:39 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 16 October 2012 18:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:13 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 14 Octo
On 23 October 2012 02:44, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:39 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 16 October 2012 18:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:13 AM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
On 14 October 2012 14:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisso
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:39 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 18:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:13 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 14 October 2012 14:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
> The problem with minivect as a p
On 21 October 2012 13:39, mark florisson wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 18:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:13 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 14 October 2012 14:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
> The problem with minivect as a package
On 16 October 2012 18:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:13 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 14 October 2012 14:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
The problem with minivect as a package is that it caters to different
projects, which have
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:13 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 14:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
>>> The problem with minivect as a package is that it caters to different
>>> projects, which have different requirements. Cython and minivect are
>>> quite
On 10/14/2012 03:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
The problem with minivect as a package is that it caters to different
projects, which have different requirements. Cython and minivect are
quite closely coupled, and any future change, or in the future any
older versi
mark florisson, 14.10.2012 15:13:
> The hg support didn't work great for me (it was really slow),
It's fast enough for almost everything. What's really slow is when it has
to figure out how to match branches after head changes - I consider that a
pretty serious bug. But that happens quite rarely.
On 14 October 2012 14:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
>> The problem with minivect as a package is that it caters to different
>> projects, which have different requirements. Cython and minivect are
>> quite closely coupled, and any future change, or in the future any
mark florisson, 14.10.2012 13:59:
> The problem with minivect as a package is that it caters to different
> projects, which have different requirements. Cython and minivect are
> quite closely coupled, and any future change, or in the future any
> older version may not have the functionality Cython
On 14 October 2012 11:23, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 11:03:
>> On 10/14/2012 10:32 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 10:18:
On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
>> On 12 October 2012 2
On 14 October 2012 09:32, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 10:18:
>> On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On F
On 14 October 2012 09:23, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 10/14/2012 10:18 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2012 05:50 P
On 10/14/2012 12:23 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 11:03:
On 10/14/2012 10:32 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 10:18:
On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljeb
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 11:03:
> On 10/14/2012 10:32 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 10:18:
>>> On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
> On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 10/12/2012
On 10/14/2012 10:32 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 10:18:
On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:1
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.10.2012 10:18:
> On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
>>> On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 10/14/2012 10:18 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12
On 10/14/2012 08:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark flori
mark florisson, 13.10.2012 20:30:
> On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
>> H
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
>
> Here a pull reques
On 10/12/2012 05:50 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
>>> Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
>>
>> Mark, any news on this? I'd like
mark florisson, 12.10.2012 12:14:
> On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
>>> Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
>>
>> Mark, any news on this? I'd like to see a version merged
On 12 October 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
>> Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
>
> Mark, any news on this? I'd like to see a version merged before the master
> branch starts diver
mark florisson, 24.08.2012 20:40:
> Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
Mark, any news on this? I'd like to see a version merged before the master
branch starts diverging all too far - it already requires a bit of adaptatio
While I have not tried this yet, array expressions in Cython might be
the final nails in the coffin for Fortran 90 as far as I am concerned.
Great work!
:-)
Sturla
On 24.08.2012 20:40, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://git
On 08/27/2012 08:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
m
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> mark florisson, 27.08
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 27.08.2012 14:47:
> On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> The code tree looks a bit disorganised currently, with a lot o
On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
My experience with lxml tells me t
On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
separate but int
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
> On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
>>> On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
separate but integrated, instead of shipping the
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
>> On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
>>> separate but integrated, instead of shipping them in a big box. As long as
>>> it doesn'
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
> On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
>> separate but integrated, instead of shipping them in a big box. As long as
>> it doesn't hurt too much to have separate tools, we should kee
On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 27.08.2012 11:55:
>> On 08/27/2012 11:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cy
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 27.08.2012 11:55:
> On 08/27/2012 11:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>> Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
>>> It includes the IndexNode refactori
On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
It includes the IndexNode refactoring branch as well.
This has been the work this last summer for the gsoc, with great
supervision from
On 08/27/2012 11:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
It includes the IndexNode refactoring branch as well.
This has been the work this
Hey,
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
It includes the IndexNode refactoring branch as well.
This has been the work this last summer for the gsoc, with great
supervision from Dag, who helped steer the project in a great
di
40 matches
Mail list logo