Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-13 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel : >> Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: >>> >>> The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last >>> time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into >>> it >> >> That was just an acci

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/8/13 Stefan Behnel : > Vitja Makarov, 13.08.2011 06:41: >> >> 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel: >>> >>> Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into it >>> >>> T

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
Vitja Makarov, 13.08.2011 06:41: 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel: Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into it That was just an accident on my side when I wasn't aware of the

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel : > Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: >> >> The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last >> time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into >> it > > That was just an accident on my side when I wasn't aware of the new branch > you had

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-07-30 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into it That was just an accident on my side when I wasn't aware of the new branch you had created. Won't happen again. Just open a

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-07-30 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > My opinion is that we create a (short-lived) branch for the release, and > continue development (ignoring the release) on master. > > If CyFunction solves no problems that blocks a release, I am -1 on merging > it into the release bran

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-07-30 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
My opinion is that we create a (short-lived) branch for the release, and continue development (ignoring the release) on master. If CyFunction solves no problems that blocks a release, I am -1 on merging it into the release branch. But we shouldn't keep things in pull requests just because we're

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-07-30 Thread mark florisson
On 30 July 2011 11:55, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel : >> Hi, >> >> I wonder what we should do with Vitja's CyFunction branch. He mentioned >> issues with it in the past (I remember that there was one specific changeset >> that he considered questionable), and it seems that we fou

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-07-30 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel : > Hi, > > I wonder what we should do with Vitja's CyFunction branch. He mentioned > issues with it in the past (I remember that there was one specific changeset > that he considered questionable), and it seems that we found several ways to > extend the function support bey

[Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-07-30 Thread Stefan Behnel
Hi, I wonder what we should do with Vitja's CyFunction branch. He mentioned issues with it in the past (I remember that there was one specific changeset that he considered questionable), and it seems that we found several ways to extend the function support beyond that, which may have an impa