On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-03-11 10:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On a more pragmatic note, includes add complexities to dependency
>> tracking
>
>
> Because you *intentionally* make things complicated. The refused pull
> request 392 could actually make dep
On 2016-03-11 10:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On a more pragmatic note, includes add complexities to dependency
tracking
Because you *intentionally* make things complicated. The refused pull
request 392 could actually make dependency checking simpler by treating
.pxd and .pxi files more alike.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Dear Cython developers,
>
> I'm writing this in response to Robert's "I'd really rather deprecate .pxi
> files completely".
>
> Can you please explain what you have against .pxi files?
They're neither necessary nor pythonic. Even C++ is try
Dear Cython developers,
I'm writing this in response to Robert's "I'd really rather deprecate
.pxi files completely".
Can you please explain what you have against .pxi files? I know they
have been abused and 95% of the historic use cases should be replaced by
other means. However, that alone
