Nikita Nemkin, 04.03.2013 18:39:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:56:59 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> As one little nit-pick, may I ask you to rename the new name references
>> to "unicode" into "py_unicode" in your code? For example, "is_unicode",
>> "get_unicode_const", "unicode_const_index", etc. Given
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:56:59 +0600, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
As one little nit-pick, may I ask you to rename the new name references
to "unicode" into "py_unicode" in your code? For example, "is_unicode",
"get_unicode_const", "unicode_const_index", etc. Given that Py_UNICODE is
no longer the na
Stefan Behnel, 03.03.2013 20:41:
> Nikita Nemkin, 03.03.2013 14:40:
>> Please reconsider your decision wrt C-level literals.
>> I believe that nogil code and a bit of efficiency (on 3.3) justify their
>> existence. (char* literals do have C-level literals, Py_UNICODE* is in
>> the same basket when
Nikita Nemkin, 03.03.2013 14:40:
> Please reconsider your decision wrt C-level literals.
> I believe that nogil code and a bit of efficiency (on 3.3) justify their
> existence. (char* literals do have C-level literals, Py_UNICODE* is in
> the same basket when it comes to Windows code).
> The code t
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:32:36 +0600, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
1) I would like to get rid of UnicodeConst. A Py_UNICODE* is not
different
from any other C array, except that it can coerce to and from Unicode
strings. So the representation of a literal should be a (properly
reference
counted) Pyth
Nikita Nemkin, 03.03.2013 09:25:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:52:49 +0600, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Are you aware that Py_UNICODE is deprecated as of Py3.3?
>>
>> http://docs.python.org/3.4/c-api/unicode.html
>>
>> Your changes look a bit excessive for supporting something that's
>> inefficient in recen
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:52:49 +0600, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
Are you aware that Py_UNICODE is deprecated as of Py3.3?
http://docs.python.org/3.4/c-api/unicode.html
Your changes look a bit excessive for supporting something that's
inefficient in recent Python versions and basically "dead".
Yes
Nikita Nemkin, 03.03.2013 08:39:
> Please review my feature proposal to add Py_UNICODE* string support
> for better Windows interoperability:
> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/191
>
> This is motivated by my current work that involves calling lots of Windows
> APIs.
>
> If people are intere
Hi,
Please review my feature proposal to add Py_UNICODE* string support
for better Windows interoperability:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/191
This is motivated by my current work that involves calling lots of Windows
APIs.
If people are interested I can elaborate on some important p
