It's not a big problem, but it'll be an ugly and invasive amount of
bookkeeping to manage these top-level typedefs per type deletion.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Hannes Röst
wrote:
> Hi Robert
>
> After some internal discussion, we have not found an obvious way to not have
> the extra typedef
Hi Robert
After some internal discussion, we have not found an obvious way to not
have the extra typedef. Is this a big problem?
Maybe there are other people on the list that are more fluent in C++ and
could think of a way to do it?
Greetings
Hannes
On 30 April 2013 07:48, Robert Bradshaw wro
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Hannes Röst
wrote:
> Dear mailing list
>
> In the process of developing a rather large Cython project where we wrap the
> scientific OpenMS library (http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-ms/) using
> Cython, we have come across an issue with the C++ code that is gen
Dear mailing list
In the process of developing a rather large Cython project where we wrap the
scientific OpenMS library (http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-ms/) using
Cython, we have come across an issue with the C++ code that is generated by
Cython. The issue is that Cython generates C++ that
