Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-23 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Baptiste Carvello > wrote: >> Le 20/07/2016 19:23, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I'm a big advocate of privacy, and informed consent when choosing to >>> give any of it away (e.g. allowing lin

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Baptiste Carvello wrote: > Le 20/07/2016 19:23, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> I'm a big advocate of privacy, and informed consent when choosing to >> give any of it away (e.g. allowing linking of activities to build a >> (pseudonymous or not) reputation)

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Baptiste Carvello wrote: > Le 20/07/2016 12:19, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > >> Github is not spyware, IMHO. It would be good to understand which of these: >> >> https://help.github.com/articles/github-privacy-policy/ >> >> you have a problem with. > > That's this on

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-21 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Isuru Fernando wrote: > FYI, travis does support CPython dev versions. > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/python#Choosing-Python-versions-to-test-against > > Travis supports caching of build dependencies. (I remember it was not free > on OS X, but it might

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-21 Thread Isuru Fernando
FYI, travis does support CPython dev versions. https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/python#Choosing-Python-versions-to-test-against Travis supports caching of build dependencies. (I remember it was not free on OS X, but it might be now). https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/ Sage is a bit

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-21 Thread Baptiste Carvello
Le 20/07/2016 19:23, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : > +1 > > I'm a big advocate of privacy, and informed consent when choosing to > give any of it away (e.g. allowing linking of activities to build a > (pseudonymous or not) reputation). (philosophical side note: "consent" is not free of coercion, and

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-21 Thread Baptiste Carvello
Le 20/07/2016 12:19, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > Github is not spyware, IMHO. It would be good to understand which of these: > > https://help.github.com/articles/github-privacy-policy/ > > you have a problem with. That's this one, in the terms of service: "One person or legal entity may not mai

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Elizabeth A. Fischer
I'm of the opinion that the simplicity of GitHub Issues is a plus in many ways. ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Baptiste Carvello > wrote: >> Le 20/07/2016 08:01, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : >> >>> trac.cython.org >>> This is probably the most controversial, but I think it makes sense to >>> migrate to github issues. W

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:41 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> Since the inception of the Cython project, William Stein's generously >> allowed us to share Sage's hardware to host Cython's infrastructure, >> which has been a great help. However

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Since the inception of the Cython project, William Stein's generously > allowed us to share Sage's hardware to host Cython's infrastructure, > which has been a great help. However, I think the time has come to > re-evaluate our options, wh

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Baptiste Carvello wrote: > Le 20/07/2016 08:01, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : > >> trac.cython.org >> This is probably the most controversial, but I think it makes sense to >> migrate to github issues. While clearly not as powerful, featureful, >> or customizable as t

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Baptiste Carvello
Le 20/07/2016 08:01, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : > trac.cython.org > This is probably the most controversial, but I think it makes sense to > migrate to github issues. While clearly not as powerful, featureful, > or customizable as trac, it seems it would fulfill our modest needs. I > am happy to do

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-07-20 08:01, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> let alone all of Sage > > Curious. Does Cython upstream regularly test SageMath? I know I test Cython > master occasionally on SageMath and stuff breaks sometimes. Admittedly that target ha

Re: [Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-20 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-07-20 08:01, Robert Bradshaw wrote: let alone all of Sage Curious. Does Cython upstream regularly test SageMath? I know I test Cython master occasionally on SageMath and stuff breaks sometimes. ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@pyt

[Cython] Cython infrastructure

2016-07-19 Thread Robert Bradshaw
Since the inception of the Cython project, William Stein's generously allowed us to share Sage's hardware to host Cython's infrastructure, which has been a great help. However, I think the time has come to re-evaluate our options, which have actually improved a lot over the last couple of years. N