Yury V. Zaytsev, 05.07.2013 23:01:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 15:52 +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Cython has nothing to do with this.
>
> Well, Cython does abstract differences for instance in terms of string
> handling between Py2.x and Py3.x, so that in fact one can enjoy it as a
> "porting" inst
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 15:52 +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> Cython has nothing to do with this.
Well, Cython does abstract differences for instance in terms of string
handling between Py2.x and Py3.x, so that in fact one can enjoy it as a
"porting" instrument. But thank you for the verdict and y
Yury V. Zaytsev, 05.07.2013 14:40:
> I have just discovered that if one uses Python 2.7 constructs in the
> code like
>
> print("Object: {}".format(obj))
>
> the resulting C++ module compiles just fine with both Python 2.6 and
> Python 2.7 headers, however, in the former case, ValueError is r
Hi,
I have just discovered that if one uses Python 2.7 constructs in the
code like
print("Object: {}".format(obj))
the resulting C++ module compiles just fine with both Python 2.6 and
Python 2.7 headers, however, in the former case, ValueError is raised at
runtime:
ValueError: zero leng
