On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> > Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
>> BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why?
>
> you should use annotated -a (and/or signed -s,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
> BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why?
you should use annotated -a (and/or signed -s, which are annotated) tags
you do not use annotated tags:
$> git de
Bradley M. Froehle, 11.09.2012 00:34:
> Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why?
Stefan
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.pytho
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Release notes: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17
>
> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseHistory
> references only 0.16 for me
> ;-)
Fixed.
___
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Release notes: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseHistory
references only 0.16 for me
;-)
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore H
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> First, congratulations and thanks for keeping such an important
> project moving forward!!
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> What about making a 0.17 branch, on which we can do 0.17.1, etc. if
>> necessary. I
First, congratulations and thanks for keeping such an important
project moving forward!!
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> What about making a 0.17 branch, on which we can do 0.17.1, etc. if
> necessary. I don't think we're to the point of needing to backport our
> bugfi
Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well?
-Brad
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 09:17:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
I know this was brought up a co
Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 09:17:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
>>> I know this was brought up a couple of months ago, but we seem to be
>>> falling into a pattern of thinking about doing a bugfix release, then
>>> saying a full relea
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
>> Is there a plan to announce more broadly? (E.g. python-announce, if
>> you haven't already (moderation adds a bit of latency).)
>
> I had already sent it to the python-announce list and also made an
> ann
Robert Bradshaw, 02.09.2012 06:05:
> Is there a plan to announce more broadly? (E.g. python-announce, if
> you haven't already (moderation adds a bit of latency).)
I had already sent it to the python-announce list and also made an
announcement on c.l.py now. :)
> I know this was brought up a cou
Hello everyone,
on behalf of the Cython project team, I'm proud to announce the final
release of Cython 0.17.
This is another major step forward in the development of the language that
will make life easier for a lot of users, rounds up some rough edges of the
compiler and adds (preliminary) supp
12 matches
Mail list logo
