2011-08-02 00:58:56 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
> A clean tarball is up at
> http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc2.tar.gz .
All tests now pass.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 02.08.2011 08:28:
On 08/02/2011 07:44 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
Maybe it's better to use "git archive"?
If it's only about creating a tarball, then 'git tag' (or, I assume, a
commit hash) will suffice -- GitHub automatically tarballs for you:
https://github.com/cython/cyt
On 08/02/2011 07:44 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/8/2 Robert Bradshaw:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of d
2011/8/2 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
>> 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
>>> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> > are not already using the lat
2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
> > are not already using the latest version from the development
> > repository, we encourage you to try out the r
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
> are not already using the latest version from the development
> repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
> http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15r
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2011-07-29 23:23:46 Dag Sverre Seljebotn napisał(a):
>> Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me.
>
> I have reported:
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1919
> (NumPy-related tests in Cython pass with Python
2011-07-29 23:23:46 Dag Sverre Seljebotn napisał(a):
> Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me.
I have reported:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1919
(NumPy-related tests in Cython pass with Python 3.*, when NumPy has been built
with the patch
from this ticket applied.)
--
Arfreve
Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me. (NumPy has an RC up currently as
well, it'd be good to test them together but don't think I have time this
weekend...)
Do you know if the problem is there with Cython 0.14? Even if not, it could
simply be that the test cases now exercise more of Nu
2011-07-29 20:51:11 mark florisson napisał(a):
> On 29 July 2011 19:18, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > 2011-07-26 13:00:10 mark florisson napisał(a):
> >> Unfortunately the output of the testrunner is rather useless here.
> >> Could you run the tests with --no-cleanup and attach
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 29 July 2011 20:06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>>> wrote:
There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1
On 29 July 2011 19:18, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2011-07-26 13:00:10 mark florisson napisał(a):
>> Unfortunately the output of the testrunner is rather useless here.
>> Could you run the tests with --no-cleanup and attach the .c and .cpp
>> files (found in build/run/c/numpy_cimp
On 29 July 2011 20:06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>> wrote:
>>> There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
>>> Output with Python 2.7:
>>>
>>> ==
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
>> There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
>> Output with Python 2.7:
>>
>> ==
>> F
2011-07-26 13:00:10 mark florisson napisał(a):
> Unfortunately the output of the testrunner is rather useless here.
> Could you run the tests with --no-cleanup and attach the .c and .cpp
> files (found in build/run/c/numpy_cimport.c, etc)? I think something
> is up with your numpy version and heade
On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
> Output with Python 2.7:
>
> ==
> FAIL: test_nested_break_continue (line 331) (parallel.__test__)
>
2011-07-25 08:17:24 Stefan Behnel napisał(a):
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 25.07.2011 08:08:
> > There are 4 NumPy-related test errors with Python 3.1 and 3.2.
>
> I assume that's NumPy 1.5? Could you provide the C compiler output from the
> test logs?
>
> This is on 64bit Linux, right
On 25 July 2011 08:08, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> There are 4 NumPy-related test errors with Python 3.1 and 3.2.
> Output with Python 3.2:
>
> ==
> ERROR: runTest (__main__.CythonRunTestCase)
> compiling (cpp) an
On 22 July 2011 04:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> are not already using the latest version from the development
>> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can
On 22 July 2011 04:52, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 21 July 2011 23:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>>> are not already using the latest version from the development
>>>
On 22 July 2011 04:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> are not already using the latest version from the development
>> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can
On 21 July 2011 23:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> are not already using the latest version from the development
>> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can
On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz
- Rob
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz
- Robert
_
25 matches
Mail list logo