Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011-08-02 00:58:56 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a): > A clean tarball is up at > http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc2.tar.gz . All tests now pass. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 02.08.2011 08:28: On 08/02/2011 07:44 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: Maybe it's better to use "git archive"? If it's only about creating a tarball, then 'git tag' (or, I assume, a commit hash) will suffice -- GitHub automatically tarballs for you: https://github.com/cython/cyt

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 08/02/2011 07:44 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: 2011/8/2 Robert Bradshaw: On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a): On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Cython has seen an enormous amount of d

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011/8/2 Robert Bradshaw : > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: >> 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a): >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: >>> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a): >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you >> > are not already using the lat

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a): > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: > > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you > > are not already using the latest version from the development > > repository, we encourage you to try out the r

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

Vitja Makarov, 31.07.2011 08:35: Anybody noticed problem with py3k: doctest.DocTestCase.Doctest: tp_new.__test__.make_new_untyped (line 132) It seems that error message have changed in new python version, That happens from time to time, yes. In case we provide a similar error message for opt

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you > are not already using the latest version from the development > repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate: > http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15r

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2011-07-29 23:23:46 Dag Sverre Seljebotn napisał(a): >> Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me. > > I have reported: > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1919 > (NumPy-related tests in Cython pass with Python

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2011/7/20 Robert Bradshaw : >> We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one >> for me to push one out. Hudson >> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good >> shape, and though I know we've

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

2011/7/20 Robert Bradshaw : > We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one > for me to push one out. Hudson > https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good > shape, and though I know we've got a big pile of stuff currently in > progress, we've also go

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011-07-29 23:23:46 Dag Sverre Seljebotn napisał(a): > Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me. I have reported: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1919 (NumPy-related tests in Cython pass with Python 3.*, when NumPy has been built with the patch from this ticket applied.) -- Arfreve

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me. (NumPy has an RC up currently as well, it'd be good to test them together but don't think I have time this weekend...) Do you know if the problem is there with Cython 0.14? Even if not, it could simply be that the test cases now exercise more of Nu

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011-07-29 20:51:11 mark florisson napisał(a): > On 29 July 2011 19:18, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > 2011-07-26 13:00:10 mark florisson napisał(a): > >> Unfortunately the output of the testrunner is rather useless here. > >> Could you run the tests with --no-cleanup and attach

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM, mark florisson wrote: > On 29 July 2011 20:06, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson >> wrote: >>> On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis >>> wrote: There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 29 July 2011 19:18, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2011-07-26 13:00:10 mark florisson napisał(a): >> Unfortunately the output of the testrunner is rather useless here. >> Could you run the tests with --no-cleanup and attach the .c and .cpp >> files (found in build/run/c/numpy_cimp

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 29 July 2011 20:06, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson > wrote: >> On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis >> wrote: >>> There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2. >>> Output with Python 2.7: >>> >>> ==

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson wrote: > On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: >> There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2. >> Output with Python 2.7: >> >> == >> F

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011-07-26 13:00:10 mark florisson napisał(a): > Unfortunately the output of the testrunner is rather useless here. > Could you run the tests with --no-cleanup and attach the .c and .cpp > files (found in build/run/c/numpy_cimport.c, etc)? I think something > is up with your numpy version and heade

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2. > Output with Python 2.7: > > == > FAIL: test_nested_break_continue (line 331) (parallel.__test__) >

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

OK Nervermind! The problem is that I don't know my question is wrong unless someone tell me "what are you talking about?" or "Please describe in detail" and Sorry for posting in here. 2011/7/28 Stefan Behnel > 최원준, 28.07.2011 09:31: > > I had posted several issues in detail on the list >> bu

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

최원준, 28.07.2011 09:31: I had posted several issues in detail on the list but there was no answer so I deleted it several times.. on the cython users list. I just want to hear the answer(like a "describe in detail") even though the answer guy doesn't know the solution. I think no answer is botheri

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

I had posted several issues in detail on the list but there was no answer so I deleted it several times.. on the cython users list. I just want to hear the answer(like a "describe in detail") even though the answer guy doesn't know the solution. I think no answer is bothering act. It is easy to te

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

The reason you do not get answers is because people do not understand your question. Please describe in detail what you want to do (on the users list). -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. "최원준" wrote: because of no answer on the cython users.. anyone knows

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

because of no answer on the cython users.. anyone knows about this? 2011/7/28 Stefan Behnel > 최원준, 28.07.2011 08:23: > > Can I make cython file from python and C using generators? >> > > Please ask your question on the cython-users mailing list, not on this > list, which is the core developer

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

최원준, 28.07.2011 08:23: Can I make cython file from python and C using generators? Please ask your question on the cython-users mailing list, not on this list, which is the core developers mailing list. And please try to be specific about what you want to achieve. It's not clear to me at all f

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

Can I make cython file from python and C using generators? 2011년 7월 25일 오후 3:17, 최원준 님의 말: > ok > > > 2011/7/25 Stefan Behnel > >> 최원준, 25.07.2011 08:03: >> >>> 2011/7/25 Vitja Makarov >>> 2011/7/25 최원준: Can I test the generators? > Sure, generators support is in m

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

2011-07-25 08:17:24 Stefan Behnel napisał(a): > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 25.07.2011 08:08: > > There are 4 NumPy-related test errors with Python 3.1 and 3.2. > > I assume that's NumPy 1.5? Could you provide the C compiler output from the > test logs? > > This is on 64bit Linux, right

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 25 July 2011 08:08, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > There are 4 NumPy-related test errors with Python 3.1 and 3.2. > Output with Python 3.2: > > == > ERROR: runTest (__main__.CythonRunTestCase) > compiling (cpp) an

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

ok 2011/7/25 Stefan Behnel > 최원준, 25.07.2011 08:03: > >> 2011/7/25 Vitja Makarov >> >>> 2011/7/25 최원준: >>> >>> Can I test the generators? >>> >>> Sure, generators support is in master already: >>> >>> https://github.com/cython/**cython >>> >> >> I don't k

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

최원준, 25.07.2011 08:03: 2011/7/25 Vitja Makarov 2011/7/25 최원준: Can I test the generators? Sure, generators support is in master already: https://github.com/cython/cython I don't know where it is.. sorry It's actually not that hard. You go to that URL, click on the big fat "Downloads" but

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

I don't know where it is.. sorry 2011/7/25 Vitja Makarov > 2011/7/25 최원준 : > > Can I test the generators? > > > > > > Sure, generators support is in master already: > > https://github.com/cython/cython > > -- > vitja. > ___ > cython-devel mailing list

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

2011/7/25 최원준 : > Can I test the generators? > > Sure, generators support is in master already: https://github.com/cython/cython -- vitja. ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

Can I test the generators? 2011/7/22 Stefan Behnel > Robert Bradshaw, 22.07.2011 01:00: > > Are the lxml failures at >> https://sage.math.washington.**edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-** >> devel-lxml-trunk-py27/ >> expe

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 22 July 2011 04:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you >> are not already using the latest version from the development >> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 22 July 2011 04:52, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On 21 July 2011 23:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >> >> On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you >>> are not already using the latest version from the development >>>

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 22 July 2011 04:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you >> are not already using the latest version from the development >> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

Robert Bradshaw, 22.07.2011 01:00: Are the lxml failures at https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-lxml-trunk-py27/ expected? Yes, the "test_xmlschema_import_file" test keeps crashing with a high probability. Some kind of threading related bug, no idea how to reproduce

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 21 July 2011 23:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you >> are not already using the latest version from the development >> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you are not already using the latest version from the development repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate: http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz - Rob

[Cython] Cython 0.15 release candidate

Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you are not already using the latest version from the development repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate: http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz - Robert _

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

Stefan, Are the lxml failures at https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-lxml-trunk-py27/ expected? - Robert ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40: >> >> On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> >>> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51: On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > We're long overdue for a release, and this week

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

2011/7/20 mark florisson : > On 20 July 2011 11:47, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40: >>> >>> On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote: mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51: > > On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> We're long overdue f

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

On 20 July 2011 11:47, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40: >> >> On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> >>> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51: On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40: On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote: mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51: On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one for me to push one out. Hudson https://sage.math.washington.edu:80

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51: >> >> On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >>> We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one >>> for me to push one out. Hudson >>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is loo

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51: On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one for me to push one out. Hudson https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good shape, and though I know we've got a big pile

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one > for me to push one out. Hudson > https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good > shape, and though I know we've got a big pile of stuff currently in > prog

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15 release

Isn't this the first release that supports yield? That's a rather big deal to me. On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Robert Bradshaw < rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one > for me to push one out. Hudson > https://sage.math.was

[Cython] Cython 0.15 release

We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one for me to push one out. Hudson https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good shape, and though I know we've got a big pile of stuff currently in progress, we've also got a big backlog of stuff to get out. I