2011/6/21 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 21.06.2011 09:07:
>>
>> 2011/6/21 Stefan Behnel:
>>>
>>> Vitja Makarov, 20.06.2011 22:23:
Wow now we have about 11K tests with 171 errors!
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-pyregr
Vitja Makarov, 21.06.2011 09:07:
2011/6/21 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 20.06.2011 22:23:
Wow now we have about 11K tests with 171 errors!
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-pyregr-py27-c/
Yes, that was a low hanging, high value bug.
"""
2011/6/21 Vitja Makarov :
> 2011/6/21 Stefan Behnel :
>> Vitja Makarov, 20.06.2011 22:23:
>>>
>>> Wow now we have about 11K tests with 171 errors!
>>>
>>>
>>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-pyregr-py27-c/
>>
>> Yes, that was a low hanging, high
2011/6/21 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 20.06.2011 22:23:
>>
>> Wow now we have about 11K tests with 171 errors!
>>
>>
>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-pyregr-py27-c/
>
> Yes, that was a low hanging, high value bug.
>
> """
> Make cyfunctio
Vitja Makarov, 20.06.2011 22:23:
Wow now we have about 11K tests with 171 errors!
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-pyregr-py27-c/
Yes, that was a low hanging, high value bug.
"""
Make cyfunction __name__ attribute writable
"""
Could you pr
Wow now we have about 11K tests with 171 errors!
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-pyregr-py27-c/
--
vitja.
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
2011/6/4 mark florisson :
> On 4 June 2011 12:24, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> I've tried that: https://github.com/vitek/cython/compare/master..._bindings
>>
>> Results are not bad: 168 failing tests for pyregr2.7 and 463 for py3
>
> Nice, it partly duplicates work in my fusedtypes branch but I suppose
On 4 June 2011 12:24, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> I've tried that: https://github.com/vitek/cython/compare/master..._bindings
>
> Results are not bad: 168 failing tests for pyregr2.7 and 463 for py3
Nice, it partly duplicates work in my fusedtypes branch but I suppose
it will have to be reworked anywa
I've tried that: https://github.com/vitek/cython/compare/master..._bindings
Results are not bad: 168 failing tests for pyregr2.7 and 463 for py3
--
vitja.
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cyt
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 23:59, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:45 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 2 June 2011
On 3 June 2011 00:04, mark florisson wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 23:59, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:45 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 23:13, Ro
On 2 June 2011 23:59, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:45 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
On 2 June 2011 23:13, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:45 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 2 June 2011 23:13, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
If any
On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 2 June 2011 23:13, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If anyone is assigning a Cython function to an object and then using
>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 23:13, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>
>> If anyone is assigning a Cython function to an object and then using
>> it they're counting on the current non-binding be
On 2 June 2011 23:13, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>
> If anyone is assigning a Cython function to an object and then using
> it they're counting on the current non-binding behavior, and it will
> break. The speed is probably a lesse
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
If anyone is assigning a Cython function to an object and then using
it they're counting on the current non-binding behavior, and it will
break. The speed is probably a lesser issue, which is what benchmarks
are for.
>>>
>>
On 2 June 2011 22:16, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:00 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 2 June 2011 18:31, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/6/2 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Vitja Makaro
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:00 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:31, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/6/2 Robert Bradshaw :
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Vitja Makarov
wrote:
> 2011/6/1 mark florisson :
>>
2011/6/2 Robert Bradshaw :
>> Initially bindings was written to support bound class methods (am I right?)
>> So when we use it for regular functions 'binding' in the name doesn't
>> reflect its purpose.
>
> There's three kinds of functions we create: PyCFunctions, binding
> PyCFunctions, and extens
On 2 June 2011 18:31, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> 2011/6/2 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/6/1 mark florisson :
> On 31 May 2011 20:25, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/6/2 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/6/1 mark florisson :
On 31 May 2011 20:25, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is bindings performance issue valuable?
>
> $
2011/6/2 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> 2011/6/1 mark florisson :
>>> On 31 May 2011 20:25, Vitja Makarov wrote:
Hi!
Is bindings performance issue valuable?
$ cat bindbench.pyx
def wo_bindings():
pass
def
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/6/1 mark florisson :
>> On 31 May 2011 20:25, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Is bindings performance issue valuable?
>>>
>>> $ cat bindbench.pyx
>>> def wo_bindings():
>>> pass
>>>
>>> def outer():
>>> def inner():
>>>
2011/6/1 mark florisson :
> On 31 May 2011 20:25, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Is bindings performance issue valuable?
>>
>> $ cat bindbench.pyx
>> def wo_bindings():
>> pass
>>
>> def outer():
>> def inner():
>> pass
>> return inner
>> with_bindings = outer()
>>
>> $ python
>
On 31 May 2011 20:25, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is bindings performance issue valuable?
>
> $ cat bindbench.pyx
> def wo_bindings():
> pass
>
> def outer():
> def inner():
> pass
> return inner
> with_bindings = outer()
>
> $ python
import timeit
timeit.repeat('with_
Hi!
Is bindings performance issue valuable?
$ cat bindbench.pyx
def wo_bindings():
pass
def outer():
def inner():
pass
return inner
with_bindings = outer()
$ python
>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.repeat('with_bindings()', setup='from bindbench import wo_bindings,
>>> with_bin
27 matches
Mail list logo