Kurt Smith schrieb am 16.07.2014 um 19:01:
> Being able to convert between simple C structs and Python dictionaries is
> great, but it doesn't work if there is a fixed-size array field in the
> struct. It seems like the following struct should be convertible safely:
>
> cdef struct state_t:
>
Apologies for the radio silence: the original project that motivated this
work has a deadline, so I've had to set this aside for now. I fully intend
to return to this once that's done.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> We can move to the PR, makes it easier to do line c
We can move to the PR, makes it easier to do line commenting.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>
>> > I have sorted out all the code
>> > generation pieces and nearly have a minimal example working, and will
>> have
>> >
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
> > I have sorted out all the code
> > generation pieces and nearly have a minimal example working, and will
> have
> > something for you to review soon. From what I can tell, Cython
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm working on getting the `to_py_function` and `from_py_function`
>> infrastructure to take arguments by reference; right now I'm getting
>> something hacked into place, and I'd appre
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
> I'm working on getting the `to_py_function` and `from_py_function`
> infrastructure to take arguments by reference; right now I'm getting
> something hacked into place, and I'd appreciate your review to point out
> the right way (or at least
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kurt Sm
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 24,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Robert Br
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Kurt
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> >>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, this'd be nice to have. One difficu
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, this'd be nice to have. One difficulty with arrays is that they
>>> can't be returned by value, and so the or
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, this'd be nice to have. One difficulty with arrays is that they
>> can't be returned by value, and so the ordinary from_py_function
>> mechanism (which gets called recursive
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>
> Yes, this'd be nice to have. One difficulty with arrays is that they
> can't be returned by value, and so the ordinary from_py_function
> mechanism (which gets called recursively) would need to be adapted.
> (Allowing to_py_function to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Being able to convert between simple C structs and Python dictionaries is
> great, but it doesn't work if there is a fixed-size array field in the
> struct. It seems like the following struct should be convertible safely:
>
> cdef
Hi devs,
Being able to convert between simple C structs and Python dictionaries is
great, but it doesn't work if there is a fixed-size array field in the
struct. It seems like the following struct should be convertible safely:
cdef struct state_t:
int i, j, k
float x[3]
float v[3]
A
18 matches
Mail list logo
