Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-02 Thread Stefan Behnel
Yaroslav Halchenko, 02.08.2012 21:54: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> just a side-note -- I didn't know that StrictVersion doesn't play nicely >>> with LooseVersion to any degree: > >>> $> python -c 'from distutils.version import LooseVersion as LV, >>> StrictVersion as SV; print

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-02 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: > > just a side-note -- I didn't know that StrictVersion doesn't play nicely > > with LooseVersion to any degree: > > $> python -c 'from distutils.version import LooseVersion as LV, > > StrictVersion as SV; print SV("0.17") > LV("0.18")' > > True > >

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-02 Thread Stefan Behnel
Yaroslav Halchenko, 02.08.2012 19:02: > just a side-note -- I didn't know that StrictVersion doesn't play nicely with > LooseVersion to any degree: > > $> python -c 'from distutils.version import LooseVersion as LV, StrictVersion > as SV; print SV("0.17") > LV("0.18")' > True > > at least in p

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-02 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Bradley M. Froehle, 01.08.2012 18:35: > > Yes, this versioning has also impacted mpi4py which had to add some pretty > > ugly code in setup.py to work around it: > > https://code.google.com/p/mpi4py/source/detail?r=841e9df > >> I am not sure what is

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-02 Thread Stefan Behnel
Bradley M. Froehle, 01.08.2012 18:35: > Yes, this versioning has also impacted mpi4py which had to add some pretty > ugly code in setup.py to work around it: > > https://code.google.com/p/mpi4py/source/detail?r=841e9df > >> I am not sure what is the status on PEP 386 [1] (not yet adopted afaik)

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-02 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012, mark florisson wrote: > Thanks for the fix. I also pushed a fix for one more test numpy_test > related to fused types dispatching. That passes all tests for me on 32 > bit linux. > > Yaroslav, could you give it a try on the Debian build servers? FWIW -- 0.16rc1-550-g8880c78

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-01 Thread mark florisson
On 31 July 2012 20:14, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Robert Bradshaw, 31.07.2012 19:24: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> mark florisson, 28.07.2012 14:04: On 27 July 2012 23:30, Bradley Froehle wrote: > Thanks to the work of Yaroslav Halchenko, there is an experimenta

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-01 Thread Bradley M. Froehle
Yes, this versioning has also impacted mpi4py which had to add some pretty ugly code in setup.py to work around it: https://code.google.com/p/mpi4py/source/detail?r=841e9df -Brad > NB I am not sure what is the status on PEP 386 [1] (not yet adopted > afaik) but it might be worthwhile following i

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
minor note -- could someone push the tag (annotated or signed preferably) for 0.17rc1? NB I am not sure what is the status on PEP 386 [1] (not yet adopted afaik) but it might be worthwhile following it and/or existing disutils.version.StrictVersion since having In [2]: Cython.__version__ Out[2]:

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
ok, the output of running OPT="-g -O0" /usr/bin/python runtests.py -vv --no-cleanup 2>&1 | tee ../0.16rc1-547-g68811fa-tests-output.txt on a cleaned git repository on an s390x boiling down to Ran 6891 tests in 1098.734s FAILED (failures=42, errors=2) is at http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/0.16

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-08-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
sorry about the delay -- was not monitoring the ML tight enough ;) So it is the commit 8443607d7dffc7c8443d70036e0cce6aaa9c26e2 Author: Stefan Behnel Date: Tue Jul 31 21:49:20 2012 +0200 determine buffer typegroup of integer dtypes based on signedness at C compile time ... I pulled curre

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-07-31 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 31.07.2012 19:24: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 28.07.2012 14:04: >>> On 27 July 2012 23:30, Bradley Froehle wrote: Thanks to the work of Yaroslav Halchenko, there is an experimental Debian package for Cython 0.17.beta1 -- >>>

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-07-31 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 28.07.2012 14:04: >> On 27 July 2012 23:30, Bradley Froehle wrote: >>> Thanks to the work of Yaroslav Halchenko, there is an experimental Debian >>> package for Cython 0.17.beta1 -- http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cython.html

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-07-31 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 28.07.2012 14:04: > On 27 July 2012 23:30, Bradley Froehle wrote: >> Thanks to the work of Yaroslav Halchenko, there is an experimental Debian >> package for Cython 0.17.beta1 -- http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cython.html >> >> However, the builds are showing a lot of test failures

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Re: Cython 0.17 beta 1 released

2012-07-28 Thread mark florisson
On 27 July 2012 23:30, Bradley Froehle wrote: > Thanks to the work of Yaroslav Halchenko, there is an experimental Debian > package for Cython 0.17.beta1 -- http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cython.html > > However, the builds are showing a lot of test failures on non-amd64 sytems. > See https://bui