On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Carlos Pita wrote:
>> > Not sure, but would it be desirable for the decorators to be less dummy and
>> > for RuntimeCompiledFunction to take the flags into account when compiling
>> > on the fly?
>>
>> Can you provide a pull request, including tests?
>
> I don't ha
> > Not sure, but would it be desirable for the decorators to be less dummy and
> > for RuntimeCompiledFunction to take the flags into account when compiling
> > on the fly?
>
> Can you provide a pull request, including tests?
I don't have much time these days but I gave some thoughts to this and
Carlos Pita schrieb am 07.04.2015 um 18:39:
> pure python mode will benefit from the addition of dummy decorators
> for compiler directives to Shadow.py, like in:
>
> @cython.boundscheck(False)
> def f(): pass
>
> AFAICS this is not currently valid inside the interpreter.
Sure, why not.
https:/
Hi all,
pure python mode will benefit from the addition of dummy decorators
for compiler directives to Shadow.py, like in:
@cython.boundscheck(False)
def f(): pass
AFAICS this is not currently valid inside the interpreter.
Cheers
--
Carlos
___
cython-
