On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> SEP updated (to what I hope is the final form):
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/numfocus/-XWwLMVgXBQ
> https://github.com/numfocus/sep/blob/master/sep200.rst
> https://github.com/dagss/pyextensibletype
Very ni
On 05/28/2012 05:59 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/28/2012 01:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
On 28 May 2012 12:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, mark florisson
wrot
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>On 05/28/2012 01:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2012 12:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 May 2012 11:41, Nathaniel
On 05/28/2012 01:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
On 28 May 2012 12:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
On 28 May 2012 11:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, mark
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 May 2012 12:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2012 11:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 Ma
On 28 May 2012 12:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 28 May 2012 11:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
On 28 May 2012 09:54, mark florisson wrote:
> On 27 May 2012 23:12,
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 May 2012 11:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2012 09:54, mark florisson wrote:
On 27 May 2012 23:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1
On 28 May 2012 11:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 28 May 2012 09:54, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 27 May 2012 23:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 1
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 28 May 2012 09:54, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 27 May 2012 23:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
> On 05/
On 28 May 2012 09:54, mark florisson wrote:
> On 27 May 2012 23:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> I think the mai
On 27 May 2012 23:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2012 12:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think the main things we'd be looking for would be:
- a clear
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2012 12:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the main things we'd be looking for would be:
>>> - a clear explanation of why a new metaclass is considered too com
On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think the main things we'd be looking for would be:
- a clear explanation of why a new metaclass is considered too complex a
solution
- what the implications are for classes that have nothing to do
On 05/18/2012 12:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think the main things we'd be looking for would be:
- a clear explanation of why a new metaclass is considered too complex a
solution
- what the implications are for classes that have nothing to do with the
SciPy/NumPy ecosystem
- how subclassing woul
I don't know where to put this so I put it up top:
I think this talk about implementing caching went a bit overboard
myself. Here's a performance ladder for you:
Alternative A) Focus on fast lookup; go from 100 ns function call to 5
ns function call
Alternative B) Focus on caching a 20 ns l
mark florisson, 17.05.2012 13:34:
> On 17 May 2012 11:14, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 17.05.2012 11:26:
>>> On 17 May 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 17.05.2012 09:12:
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
>>> On 16 May 201
On 17 May 2012 11:14, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 17.05.2012 11:26:
>> On 17 May 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 17.05.2012 09:12:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Why
On 17 May 2012 11:03, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 17.05.2012 11:15:
>> On 17 May 2012 07:09, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>>> Does this use case make sense to e
mark florisson, 17.05.2012 11:26:
> On 17 May 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 17.05.2012 09:12:
>>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Why not just use a custom attribute on callables that ho
mark florisson, 17.05.2012 11:15:
> On 17 May 2012 07:09, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
>>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
"Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>>
>> The reason why we are discus
On 17 May 2012 08:36, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 17.05.2012 09:12:
>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Why not just use a custom attribute on callables that hold a
> PyCapsule? Whenever we see ins
On 17 May 2012 07:09, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>
> The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are loo
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 17.05.2012 09:12:
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
>>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Why not just use a custom attribute on callables that hold a
PyCapsule? Whenever we see inside of a Cython implemented function
that an o
Stefan Behnel wrote:
>mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>
> The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are
>looking
> for a ge
mark florisson, 16.05.2012 21:49:
> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
Does this use case make sense to everyone?
The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are looking
for a general way to expose these C level
On 16 May 2012 21:16, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 20:49:18 +0100, mark florisson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>
> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>
> The reason why we are d
On 16 May 2012 21:16, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 20:49:18 +0100, mark florisson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>
> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>
> The reason why we are d
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>>> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>>>
>>> The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are looking
>>> for a general way to expose these C level signatures within the Python
On Wed, 16 May 2012 20:49:18 +0100, mark florisson
wrote:
On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
"Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
Does this use case make sense to everyone?
The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are
looking
for a general way to expose these C
On 16 May 2012 20:49, mark florisson wrote:
> On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
Does this use case make sense to everyone?
The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are looking
for a general way to expose th
On 16 May 2012 20:15, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>>> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>>>
>>> The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are looking
>>> for a general way to expose these C level signatures within the Python
>>> ecosyst
"Martin v. Löwis", 16.05.2012 20:33:
>> Does this use case make sense to everyone?
>>
>> The reason why we are discussing this on python-dev is that we are looking
>> for a general way to expose these C level signatures within the Python
>> ecosystem. And Dag's idea was to expose them as part of th
32 matches
Mail list logo