Vitja Makarov, 23.09.2011 16:38:
2011/9/23 mark florisson:
Can't you run the entire CF analysis after analyse expressions? I
think only the code generation needs the cf_* attributes?
I'm not sure here. CF solution could be used to improve type inference
in the future.
Yes, CF analysis should
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/9/23 mark florisson :
>> On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
>
2011/9/23 mark florisson :
> On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
wrote:
> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Sep 21,
On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
>> Hi R
2011/9/23 mark florisson :
> On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
wrote:
> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Sep 21,
On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
>> Hi R
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> The war
2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
> va
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
values of cya and cyb? (I suppose this coul
2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
>>> values of cya and cyb? (I suppose this could be possible by taking the
>>> address of the "passed by refere
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
>> values of cya and cyb? (I suppose this could be possible by taking the
>> address of the "passed by reference" arguments, but would seem like a
Hi Robert,
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
values of cya and cyb? (I suppose this could be possible by taking the
address of the "passed by reference" arguments, but would seem like a
*very* poor API design.)
thanks for your fast answer!
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:32 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a (misleading) Cython warning from the following code example:
>
>
> cdef extern from "":
> void foo(int &a, int &b)
>
> cdef cyfoo():
> cdef int cya, cyb
> foo(cya, cyb)
> -
Hi,
I got a (misleading) Cython warning from the following code example:
cdef extern from "":
void foo(int &a, int &b)
cdef cyfoo():
cdef int cya, cyb
foo(cya, cyb)
Executing "cython --cplus" produced these messages:
14 matches
Mail list logo
