Just trying and improve the state of the art. Yea maybe we have to add
some tricks to separate the two grammar wise, so they can play together.
Besides, I didn't start with that complexity, it evolved into seeing if
that was a viable path forward.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Alex S. wrote:
>
> > I have another idea/iteration to run by you then. One of your chief
> > quibbles, although I don't think it's your underlying one, is Cython must
> > understand what's going on. So how about we support a block of C/C++
> code
> > as a proper construct. Same name but now, I guess braces may
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > To clarify, I'm coming from the case where I
> > didn't read the whole tutorial/docs before being faced with pyx in the
> > projects I previously mentioned, while on tight turn around time - I was
> not
> > able to grok in that context.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> In my experience Cython has generally been fairly easy to pick up for
> people who already know Python. And Python often easy to pick up for
> people who already know C/C++. Of course for many wrappings it often
> takes non-trivial knowl
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Ian Henriksen <
insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Remember - cython is "the way" that comes up for how to glue C/C++ into
>> python these days, not just the program in cish python frontend for speed.
>>
>>
> There's some truth to the issues you raise
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 21.08.2016 um 11:11:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> >> PyInline's last news update was in 2004 where the author gives a "Hats
> of[f]
> >> to PyRex", prior to that only a few blog en
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> Especially with respect to C++, we've always tried to make things safe and
> helpful that Cython can support directly, and to make things possible that
> are too complex to handle safely. But I agree with Robert that allowing
> arbitrary C
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jason Newton wrote:
> > You must realize that almost any other python driven way to compile
> c-code
> > in the spirit these projects do is deprecated/dead. Cython has absorbed
> all
&
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> > Accidentally posted to an already-opened tab for the cython-users ML
> > yesterday, moving to here. Following up from a github opened issue here:
> >
> >
Accidentally posted to an already-opened tab for the cython-users ML
yesterday, moving to here. Following up from a github opened issue here:
https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/1440
I was hoping we could give a way to drop straight into C/C++ inside of
Cython pyx files.
Why?
-It [helps] av
I just added inline_module's and submitted a PR today here:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/555
My intent was something like OpenCL's JIT/AOC compilation (PyCUDA/PyOpenCL
also work this way) which is simple and high performance, and I saw cython
had this capability and just needed a little b
11 matches
Mail list logo
