On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The simplest possible program using memory views compiles with a large
> > number of warnings for me, even for a rather outdated version of gcc:
> >
> > def hello(i
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/9/13 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> On 9 September 2011 05:26, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
Does it work with icc if you replace
# define CYTHON_UNUSED __attribute__ (
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:31 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 29 August 2011 19:25, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel, 29.08.2011 16:33:
>>>
>>> here's an interesting history wrap-up of SWIG, by its original author.
>>> [...]
>>
>> And an interesting reply:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> David Cournapeau, 30.07.2011 10:52:
>>
>> Python 2.4 is still surprisingly
>> common. Working around it for C extensions can be pretty daunting.
>
> The same applies to Cython, obviously, although I do see the adv
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> This version also was the first one to use an AST for parsing (not sure if
> that's interesting for us), and it was the first to ship with ctypes/libffi,
> which keeps being considered as a future basis for certain advanced Cython
> featur
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Cython is,
> without comparison, the easiest way of writing C extensions for Python.
> FWIW, it's easier to use Cython than ctypes. Using Cython instead of the C
> API will also avoid many programming errors, because a compiler does fewer
>
