Robert Bradshaw [rober...@gmail.com] wrote:
>Yes, it still is. But it would be nice to get any such major changes
>out of the way ahead of time.
I think the "compiling Python" goal is so orthogonal to the goal of
how "beyond Python syntax work" or simplicity of the parsing impl
that "getting it ou
Greg Ewing wrote:
>What would be the benefit of this? You're proposing to change
>from something identical to C declaration syntax, which is
>second nature for a great many people, to something that
>looks deceptively like C syntax but isn't.
>
>I can't see that causing anything other than a massiv
>>> On 21 April 2011 08:57, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> I mean simple script that run cython compiler and then build shared
>> python module.
>> It's much better then manually run cython then gcc or write makefile for
>> this.
>
>Ah, I see. Yeah that might be convenient. Although there is always pyxi
