Stefan Behnel schrieb am 05.11.23 um 23:06:
I'd like to ease our feature development by using more modern Python
features in our code base and by targeting less Python versions in Cython
3.1 compared to the "all things supported" Cython 3.0.
I created a 3.0.x maintenance branch and removed the
Lisandro Dalcin schrieb am 06.11.23 um 09:05:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 01:19, Stefan Behnel wrote:
it looks like Cython 3.0.6 is going to be a "most things fixed" kind of
release for the 3.0.x release series.
I'm having issues using CYTHON_LIMITED_API with some Python versions
(<=3.9).
If you are
da-woods schrieb am 06.11.23 um 08:48:
> I also consider Cython 3.1 a prime target for better Limited API support.
Yes - but I wouldn't treat complete support as a blocker (I don't think
this is what you meant though).
It's experimental in 3.0 and I don't expect it to "fully" work in 3.1.
I agree with most of this.
> I also consider Cython 3.1 a prime target for better Limited API
support.
Yes - but I wouldn't treat complete support as a blocker (I don't think
this is what you meant though).
There's a separate question about what we consider the minimum viable
Limited API v
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 01:19, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it looks like Cython 3.0.6 is going to be a "most things fixed" kind of
> release for the 3.0.x release series.
I'm having issues using CYTHON_LIMITED_API with some Python versions
(<=3.9).
If you are not in a rush to release 3.0.6