On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 06.09.2017 um 07:21:
>> I'm not a huge fan of behaving differently depending on what syntax
>> was used to annotate the return type--I'd rather they be 100% aliases
>> of each other.
>
> Regarding this bit - I alrea
Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 06.09.2017 um 07:21:
> I'm not a huge fan of behaving differently depending on what syntax
> was used to annotate the return type--I'd rather they be 100% aliases
> of each other.
Regarding this bit - I already chose to implement some differences for
annotation typing. M
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since PEP 484 type annotations are scheduled for the next release now, I
> wonder if we should take the opportunity to change the defaults for the
> exception handling of typed cdef functions.
>
> Currently, if you define a functi
