On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
Hope that helps to fix the problem for good though!
Apparently a separate, but related bug: when C++ class constructor is
templated, Cython fails to compile the code.
However, if I specify a return type (irrespectively of what type is), it
seems
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
If the return type of a function is a normal type, then everything is
fine, but if it's a pointer or reference type, then Cython refuses to
compile it.
I've just found out that apparently this happens because Cython misparses
function definition as
Hi,
I came across the following bug, while trying to implement iterator
versions of std::string members, for which a simple reproducer is below.
If the return type of a function is a normal type, then everything is
fine, but if it's a pointer or reference type, then Cython refuses to
compile
