On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, C Blake wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw robertwb at gmail.com wrote:
>>Quick: is that a pointer to an array or 10 pointers to ints? Yes, I
>>know what it is, but the thing is without knowing C (well) it's not
>>immediately obvious what the precedence should be.
>
> If you
Nathaniel Smith schrieb am 07.11.2014 um 23:43:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Cython sometimes fails to build on Travis for various projects. If it
>> fails, it always ends with this error:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/certik/08f16dd572170c17d956
Might be a problem wit
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cython sometimes fails to build on Travis for various projects. If it
> fails, it always ends with this error:
>
> https://gist.github.com/certik/08f16dd572170c17d956
I don't have any insight into the error, but for CI purposes I inst
Robert Bradshaw robertwb at gmail.com wrote:
>Quick: is that a pointer to an array or 10 pointers to ints? Yes, I
>know what it is, but the thing is without knowing C (well) it's not
>immediately obvious what the precedence should be.
If you're gonna pick something e.g like that, it should not be
Hi,
Cython sometimes fails to build on Travis for various projects. If it
fails, it always ends with this error:
https://gist.github.com/certik/08f16dd572170c17d956
Here are some instances of this failure in other projects:
https://github.com/sympy/csympy/issues/308
https://github.com/scipy/sci
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Ian Henriksen
wrote:
> On Thursday, November 6, 2014 9:48:53 PM UTC-7, 1989lzhh wrote:
>>
>> > 在 Nov 7, 2014，02:56，Robert Bradshaw 写道：
>> >
>> > [Cc'ing elsewhere for more feedback. Also top-posting for initial
>> > impressions before the discussion.]
>> >
>> > He
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, C Blake wrote:
> I think you should just use the C declarator syntax. Cython already
> allows you to say "cdef int *foo[10]".
Quick: is that a pointer to an array or 10 pointers to ints? Yes, I
know what it is, but the thing is without knowing C (well) it's not
im
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 9:48:53 PM UTC-7, 1989lzhh wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > 在 Nov 7, 2014，02:56，Robert Bradshaw >
> 写道：
> >
> > [Cc'ing elsewhere for more feedback. Also top-posting for initial
> > impressions before the discussion.]
> >
> > Here's some proposed function pointer syntaxes; whi
