No, I'm missing something now; AFAIK there are only two numpy behaviors:
with relaxed strides and without relaxed strides, and version number should
be irrelevant beyond that. What's different between
1.8-without-relaxed-strides and 1.7 that makes the test break?
On 4 Jan 2014 22:01, "Stefan Behnel
Stefan Behnel, 04.01.2014 22:51:
> Stefan Behnel, 04.01.2014 22:47:
>> Nathaniel Smith, 04.01.2014 18:36:
>>> On 4 Jan 2014 17:07, "Robert Bradshaw" wrote:
Yes, that'd be good. Do you know how? I won't have time to look at this
>>> 'till next week.
>>>
>>> Something like
>>>
>>> if not np.ones
Stefan Behnel, 04.01.2014 22:47:
> Nathaniel Smith, 04.01.2014 18:36:
>> On 4 Jan 2014 17:07, "Robert Bradshaw" wrote:
>>> Yes, that'd be good. Do you know how? I won't have time to look at this
>> 'till next week.
>>
>> Something like
>>
>> if not np.ones((10, 1), order="C").flags.f_contiguous:
>>
Nathaniel Smith, 04.01.2014 18:36:
> On 4 Jan 2014 17:07, "Robert Bradshaw" wrote:
>> Yes, that'd be good. Do you know how? I won't have time to look at this
> 'till next week.
>
> Something like
>
> if not np.ones((10, 1), order="C").flags.f_contiguous:
> # numpy without relaxed stride support
On 4 Jan 2014 17:07, "Robert Bradshaw" wrote:
>
> Yes, that'd be good. Do you know how? I won't have time to look at this
'till next week.
Something like
if not np.ones((10, 1), order="C").flags.f_contiguous:
# numpy without relaxed stride support
raise SkipTest
> On Jan 4, 2014 9:54 AM, "N
Yes, that'd be good. Do you know how? I won't have time to look at this
'till next week.
On Jan 4, 2014 9:54 AM, "Nathaniel Smith" wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2014 11:53, "Stefan Behnel" wrote:
> >
> > mark florisson, 03.01.2014 23:28:
> > > On 3 January 2014 18:22, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > >> I enabled t
On 4 Jan 2014 11:53, "Stefan Behnel" wrote:
>
> mark florisson, 03.01.2014 23:28:
> > On 3 January 2014 18:22, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> >> I enabled the NumPy build for our Py3.3 test runs and while I was at
it, I
> >> got it to use the latest NumPy release 1.8. This made one of the tests
fail:
> >>
Robert Bradshaw, 04.01.2014 17:40:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel, 04.01.2014 12:53:
>>> I didn't define the NPY_RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING
>>> environment variable for the NumPy build. Let's try that first.
>>>
>>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/release.html
Excellent, thanks. I'll make sure this gets into the release.
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel, 04.01.2014 12:53:
>> mark florisson, 03.01.2014 23:28:
>>> On 3 January 2014 18:22, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I enabled the NumPy build for our Py3.3 test runs and w
Stefan Behnel, 04.01.2014 12:53:
> mark florisson, 03.01.2014 23:28:
>> On 3 January 2014 18:22, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> I enabled the NumPy build for our Py3.3 test runs and while I was at it, I
>>> got it to use the latest NumPy release 1.8. This made one of the tests fail:
>>>
>>> """
>>> T
mark florisson, 03.01.2014 23:28:
> On 3 January 2014 18:22, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> I enabled the NumPy build for our Py3.3 test runs and while I was at it, I
>> got it to use the latest NumPy release 1.8. This made one of the tests fail:
>>
>> """
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
