Re: [Cython] Git tag for 0.19.1?

2013-08-05 Thread Stefan Behnel
Lisandro Dalcin, 05.08.2013 21:00: > I cannot find the tag 0.19.1 in the repository? Did you forget to push it? Yes, apparently. Thanks for the reminder. Stefan ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin

[Cython] Git tag for 0.19.1?

2013-08-05 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
I cannot find the tag 0.19.1 in the repository? Did you forget to push it? -- Lisandro Dalcin --- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169 __

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-08-05 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:36:48PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > its bearable, and it's just automake. manually created makefiles are not > > affected. why does cython use .pyx for two different things? what would > > be the canonical extension for C++ cython files? i've chosen to use .pyxx, >

Re: [Cython] PEP 442: safe object finalisation

2013-08-05 Thread Stefan Behnel
Torsten Landschoff, 05.08.2013 10:02: > On 08/03/2013 06:24 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> CPython 3.4 will have a new way to handle object finalisation. >> >> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0442/ >> >> I think we should switch the current deallocation code to make use of it. >> That should fix th

Re: [Cython] PEP 442: safe object finalisation

2013-08-05 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Stefan, On 08/03/2013 06:24 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > CPython 3.4 will have a new way to handle object finalisation. > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0442/ > > I think we should switch the current deallocation code to make use of it. > That should fix the problem we currently have with u