Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Stefan Behnel
Felix Salfelder, 27.06.2013 23:06: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> Building Python extensions with makefiles/autotools rather than >> distutils is less supported, but I suppose you could do that manually. > > i've done that. I ran into a few peculiarities with

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Building Python extensions with makefiles/autotools rather than > distutils is less supported, but I suppose you could do that manually. i've done that. I ran into a few peculiarities with "-I", "-w", and __init__.py, but nothing s

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Felix Salfelder wrote: > Hi Robert. > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:05:48AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> And you're planning on calling cython manually, cutting distutils out >> of the loop completely? > > If someone tells me, how to fix distutils, (better: doe

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
Hi Robert. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:05:48AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > And you're planning on calling cython manually, cutting distutils out > of the loop completely? If someone tells me, how to fix distutils, (better: does it), i might change my mind. also, I need VPATH... just something

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:23:21AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> > explicit dependency tracking would imply "manual". which is painful and >> > error-prone. without running gcc -M (with all flags) you cannot even >> > guess the headers

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:23:21AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > explicit dependency tracking would imply "manual". which is painful and > > error-prone. without running gcc -M (with all flags) you cannot even > > guess the headers used transitively. I haven't found a gcc -M call > > within the

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote: > Hi Stefan. > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:58:28AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Make doesn't know that either. Cython at least knows which ones are used >> directly. Handling transitive dependencies would require parsing header >> files. I

Re: [Cython] patch for #655

2013-06-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
Hi Stefan. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:58:28AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Make doesn't know that either. Cython at least knows which ones are used > directly. Handling transitive dependencies would require parsing header > files. If you need to keep track of changes in transitively included head