Christian Inci, 24.01.2013 16:19:
> On 01/24/2013 03:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> If you prefer keeping the set of integer values at a separate place, this
>> should work:
>
>> DEF INT_TUPLE = (0x66, 0x67, 0x2e,
>> 0x36, 0x3e, 0x26, 0x64,
>> 0x65, 0x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/24/2013 03:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> How do you know that INT_TUPLE isn't reassigned to something else?
On 01/24/2013 03:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> This is not an optimisation as it might render the code incorrect. How can
> Cython
On 01/24/2013 03:13 PM, Christian Inci wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subject: Feature Request: expand list/tuple in 'if (... in ...):' ...
expand list/tuple in 'if (... in ...):' on compile-time if the list/tuple
contains only static values.
test1: list is expanded manu
[moving this to cython-users]
Christian Inci, 24.01.2013 15:13:
> Subject: Feature Request: expand list/tuple in 'if (... in ...):' ...
>
> expand list/tuple in 'if (... in ...):' on compile-time if the list/tuple
> contains only static values.
>
> test1: list is expanded manually.
> test2: lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subject: Feature Request: expand list/tuple in 'if (... in ...):' ...
expand list/tuple in 'if (... in ...):' on compile-time if the list/tuple
contains only static values.
test1: list is expanded manually.
test2: list is not expanded.
The output o
