Re: [Cython] Cython 0.17.1 released

2012-09-29 Thread Stefan Behnel
Yaroslav Halchenko, 30.09.2012 01:09: > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17.1 > > and a regular contribution: > http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseHistory > references only 0.17 for me > ;-) I added the link. Thanks. Stefan ___

Re: [Cython] changelog for regular releases (was: ref-leak in 0.17)

2012-09-29 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Robert Bradshaw, 26.09.2012 10:10: >> Also, on a more general note, I would rather err towards more small >> bugfix releases (when impactful bugs come up) instead of the pattern >> we've fallen into of only releasing a couple times a year. >

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.17 final released

2012-09-29 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> > Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well? >> BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why? > > you should use annotated -a (and/or signed -s,

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.17.1 released

2012-09-29 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: > http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17.1 and a regular contribution: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseHistory references only 0.17 for me ;-) -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth Colle

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.17 final released

2012-09-29 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote: > > Any chance we can tag the official 0.17 release in Github as well? > BTW, do we use lightweight tags or annotated tags in git? And why? you should use annotated -a (and/or signed -s, which are annotated) tags you do not use annotated tags: $> git de