On 08/27/2012 08:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
m
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> mark florisson, 27.08
On 8/27/2012 2:42 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 27 August 2012 01:39, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 8/26/2012 4:08 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 25 August 2012 03:07, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
Hi,
On 8/24/2012 12:43 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
thanks for testing!
Christoph Gohlke, 24.08.2
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 27.08.2012 14:47:
> On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> The code tree looks a bit disorganised currently, with a lot o
On 08/27/2012 02:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
My experience with lxml tells me t
On 08/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
separate but int
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:52:
> On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
>>> On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
separate but integrated, instead of shipping the
On 27 August 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
>> On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
>>> separate but integrated, instead of shipping them in a big box. As long as
>>> it doesn'
mark florisson, 27.08.2012 13:13:
> On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> My experience with lxml tells me that it's often better to keep things
>> separate but integrated, instead of shipping them in a big box. As long as
>> it doesn't hurt too much to have separate tools, we should kee
On 27 August 2012 12:06, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 27.08.2012 11:55:
>> On 08/27/2012 11:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cy
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 27.08.2012 11:55:
> On 08/27/2012 11:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>> Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
>>> It includes the IndexNode refactori
On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
It includes the IndexNode refactoring branch as well.
This has been the work this last summer for the gsoc, with great
supervision from
On 08/27/2012 11:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:40 PM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
Here a pull request for element-wise array expressions for Cython:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/144
It includes the IndexNode refactoring branch as well.
This has been the work this
On 27 August 2012 01:39, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 8/26/2012 4:08 AM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 25 August 2012 03:07, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/24/2012 12:43 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
thanks for testing!
Christoph Gohlke, 24
14 matches
Mail list logo