On 8/23/2012 11:13 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hello everyone,
on behalf of the Cython project team, I'm proud to announce the release of
our third beta of Cython 0.17. This is our first and hopefully last release
candidate for 0.17, another major step forward in the development of the
language tha
2012/8/24 Vitja Makarov :
> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:42:
2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
>> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
>>> Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:03:
2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
> V
2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov :
> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel :
>> Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:42:
>>> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
>> Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:03:
>>> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 22.08.2012 22:34:
Yaroslav Halchenko, 23.08.2012 21:23:
> my not so wild but still a guess that 0.17b3 corresponds to
> 5b0e8f8b96e353ac6d12d54f86babee9ff6f1bf8 git commit (never know for sure
> if there is no tag :-P )? ;)
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.17
hg-git isn't all that good at mirroring tags back
congrats!
my not so wild but still a guess that 0.17b3 corresponds to
5b0e8f8b96e353ac6d12d54f86babee9ff6f1bf8 git commit (never know for sure
if there is no tag :-P )? ;)
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> on behalf of the Cython project team, I'm proud to announce
Hello everyone,
on behalf of the Cython project team, I'm proud to announce the release of
our third beta of Cython 0.17. This is our first and hopefully last release
candidate for 0.17, another major step forward in the development of the
language that will make life easier for a lot of users, ro
2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:42:
>> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
>>> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
> Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:03:
>> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
>>> Vitja Makarov, 22.08.2012 22:34:
2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
>
Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:42:
> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
>> 2012/8/23 Vitja Makarov:
>>> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:03:
> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
>> Vitja Makarov, 22.08.2012 22:34:
>>> 2012/8/23 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 22.08.2012 22:11
Vitja Makarov, 23.08.2012 07:42:
> Another (maybe better) solution is to fix CF. It mustn't set
> cf_maybe_null to False at class scope based on reference success.
Ah, yes - that sounds totally like the right solution. Class scopes are a
lot different from function scopes.
Stefan
___
