2012/7/24 mark florisson :
> On 23 July 2012 20:28, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> 2012/7/23 Vitja Makarov :
>>> Here is part of original testcase:
>>>
>>> from cython.operator cimport dereference as d
>>> from cython.operator cimport preincrement as incr
>>> from libcpp.vector cimport vector
>>>
>>> def
Hello everyone,
on behalf of the Cython project team, I'm proud to announce the release of
our first beta of Cython 0.17. This is another major step forward in the
development of the language that will make life easier for a lot of users,
rounds up some rough edges of the compiler and adds (prelim
On 23 July 2012 20:28, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/7/23 Vitja Makarov :
>> Here is part of original testcase:
>>
>> from cython.operator cimport dereference as d
>> from cython.operator cimport preincrement as incr
>> from libcpp.vector cimport vector
>>
>> def reverse_iteration_test(L):
>> v
2012/7/23 Vitja Makarov :
> Here is part of original testcase:
>
> from cython.operator cimport dereference as d
> from cython.operator cimport preincrement as incr
> from libcpp.vector cimport vector
>
> def reverse_iteration_test(L):
> v = new vector[int]()
> for a in L:
> v.push_
mark florisson, 23.07.2012 21:02:
> Was this comment "Note that some
> aspects of the memory views feature may not currently work in Python
> 2.4.x. This is a known bug." in the release notes about the copying of
> Python slice objects?
Yes, about the failing tests. I removed it now.
Stefan
On 23 July 2012 19:55, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 23.07.2012 20:07:
>> On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20:
On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20:
>> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merge
mark florisson, 23.07.2012 20:07:
> On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20:
>>> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20:
> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release?
I was ok with it when
mark florisson, 23.07.2012 20:38:
> On 23 July 2012 19:07, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20:
I'll have to renew that pull request using the final rebase. I'll then
rebase the rest of my working branch on master.
>>>
On 23 July 2012 19:07, mark florisson wrote:
> On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20:
>>> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20:
> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release?
I was ok
On 23 July 2012 18:54, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20:
>> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20:
Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release?
>>>
>>> I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good
mark florisson, 17.07.2012 12:20:
> On 17 July 2012 10:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 10.07.2012 11:20:
>>> Do you want _refactor_indexnode merged for this release?
>>
>> I was ok with it when I first skipped over it. It would be good to give it
>> another pair of eyeballs, but apart f
Stefan Behnel, 18.07.2012 09:09:
> the following pull request tries to fix the fact that we currently generate
> arguments of type "PyObject*" when someone spells out "type" for them.
>
> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/126
>
> That's mostly a problem in CPython's C-API, but also in some Nu
12 matches
Mail list logo
