Hi,
thanks for the report.
Dieter Maurer, 07.06.2012 10:44:
> "cython 0.13" generates bad C code for the attached "pyx" file.
Could you try the latest release? I would at least expect an error instead
of actually generating code.
> "cython" itself recognizes that it did something wrong and emi
Both __init__ and __cinit__ are passed the same arguments, and the
former has Python calling conventions. (Also, we use Python's
framework to allocate and construct the new object, so there's not a
huge amount of flexibility here and working around this would be quite
non-trivial).
On Thu, Jun 7,
On 06/07/2012 12:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/07/2012 12:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 06/06/2012 10:41 PM,
The following cython source leads to a "Cannot convert 'pointer' to Python
object".
ctypedef void * pointer
cdef extern from "nonexistant.h":
cdef pointer to_pointer(object)
cdef class C:
cdef pointer p
def __cinit__(self, pointer p): self.p = p
c = C(to_pointer(None))
Why does the con
On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:00 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
Is the goal then to avoid having to have an interning registry?
Yes, and to avoid invoking an expensive hash function at runtime in
o
On 06/06/2012 11:00 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
Is the goal then to avoid having to have an interning registry?
Yes, and to avoid invoking an expensive hash function at runtime in
order to achieve good distribution.
I don't underst
On 06/07/2012 12:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/07/2012 12:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 06/06/2012 10:41 PM,
On 06/07/2012 12:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 06/06/2012 10:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/05/2012 12:
"cython 0.13" generates bad C code for the attached "pyx" file.
"cython" itself recognizes that it did something wrong and emits ";"
to the generated file:
...
static __pyx_t_12cybug_and_or_pointer __pyx_f_12cybug_and_or_bug(PyObject
*__pyx_v_o) {
__pyx_t_12cybug_and_or_pointer __pyx_r;
int
