Re: [Cython] Hash-based vtables

2012-06-04 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > > > Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> wrote: >>> On 06/04/2012 09:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: Me and Robert had a long discussion on the NumFOCUS list about this al

Re: [Cython] Hash-based vtables

2012-06-04 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Robert Bradshaw wrote: >On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> On 06/04/2012 09:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >>> >>> Me and Robert had a long discussion on the NumFOCUS list about this >>> already, but I figured it was better to continue it and provide more >>> i

Re: [Cython] Hash-based vtables

2012-06-04 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 06/04/2012 09:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> >> Me and Robert had a long discussion on the NumFOCUS list about this >> already, but I figured it was better to continue it and provide more >> in-depth benchmark results here. >>

Re: [Cython] Hash-based vtables

2012-06-04 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 06/04/2012 09:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: Me and Robert had a long discussion on the NumFOCUS list about this already, but I figured it was better to continue it and provide more in-depth benchmark results here. It's basically a new idea of how to provide a vtable based on perfect hash

[Cython] Hash-based vtables

2012-06-04 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Me and Robert had a long discussion on the NumFOCUS list about this already, but I figured it was better to continue it and provide more in-depth benchmark results here. It's basically a new idea of how to provide a vtable based on perfect hashing, which should be a lot simpler to implement than