On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 01:34 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.05.2012 21:37:
Anyway, thanks for the heads up, this seems to need a bit more work.
Nathaniel Smith, 14.05.2012 19:05:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 01:34 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.05.2012 21:37:
Anyway, thanks for the heads up, this seems to need a bit more work.
Input
from somebody more
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 01:34 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.05.2012 21:37:
>>>
>>> Anyway, thanks for the heads up, this seems to need a bit more work.
>>> Input
>>> from somebody more familiar with this corner of the C
On 05/14/2012 01:34 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.05.2012 21:37:
Anyway, thanks for the heads up, this seems to need a bit more work. Input
from somebody more familiar with this corner of the CPython API very welcome.
Wouldn't you consider python-dev an appropriate place to
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 08:44 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This comes from a refactor of the work on CEP 1000: A PEP proposal, with
>>> a
>>> hack for use in current P
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.05.2012 21:37:
> Anyway, thanks for the heads up, this seems to need a bit more work. Input
> from somebody more familiar with this corner of the CPython API very welcome.
Wouldn't you consider python-dev an appropriate place to discuss this?
Stefan
__
