Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 15:47:
> 2012/5/8 Stefan Behnel:
>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow, so I wonder if
>> this will enable us to properly infer this:
>>
>> def partial_validity():
>>"""
>>>>> partial_validity()
>>('Python object', 'double', 'str object')
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:09 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 20:08, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 9 May 2012 19:56, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:35 AM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
On 8 May 2012 10:47, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> After some th
On 9 May 2012 20:08, mark florisson wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 19:56, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:35 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 8 May 2012 10:47, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
After some thinking I believe I can see more clearly where Mark is coming
On 9 May 2012 19:56, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:35 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 8 May 2012 10:47, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>>
>>> After some thinking I believe I can see more clearly where Mark is coming
>>> from. To sum up, it's either
>>>
>>> A) Keep both np.nda
On 9 May 2012 19:55, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 09.05.2012 20:45:
>> You can also use newaxis indexing or transpose the view
>
> What is "newaxis indexing"?
>
> Stefan
> ___
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel@python.org
> http://mail.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:35 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 8 May 2012 10:47, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> After some thinking I believe I can see more clearly where Mark is coming
>> from. To sum up, it's either
>>
>> A) Keep both np.ndarray[double] and double[:] around, with clearly defined
mark florisson, 09.05.2012 20:45:
> You can also use newaxis indexing or transpose the view
What is "newaxis indexing"?
Stefan
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
On 9 May 2012 19:35, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 08.05.2012 11:24:
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 08.05.2012 09:57:
>>> 1) We NEVER deprecate "np.ndarray[double]", we commit to keeping that
>>> in
>>> the language. I
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 08.05.2012 11:24:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 08.05.2012 09:57:
>> 1) We NEVER deprecate "np.ndarray[double]", we commit to keeping that in
>> the language. It means exactly what you would like double[:] to mean,
>
2012/5/9 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 09.05.2012 15:18:
>>> On 9 May 2012 14:16, Vitja Makarov wrote:
from cython cimport typeof
def foo(float[::1] a):
b = a
#del b
print typeof(b)
print t
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 09.05.2012 15:18:
>> On 9 May 2012 14:16, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> from cython cimport typeof
>>>
>>> def foo(float[::1] a):
>>> b = a
>>> #del b
>>> print typeof(b)
>>> print typeof(a)
>>>
>>>
>>> In this example `
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 18:31:
>> Del statement inference enabled pyregr.test_descr testcase and it SIGSEGVs.
>> Here is minimal example:
>>
>> import unittest
>> import sys
>>
>> class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
>> def test_file_fault(self):
>> # Testing sys.s
Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 18:31:
> Del statement inference enabled pyregr.test_descr testcase and it SIGSEGVs.
> Here is minimal example:
>
> import unittest
> import sys
>
> class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
> def test_file_fault(self):
> # Testing sys.stdout is changed in getattr...
>
Del statement inference enabled pyregr.test_descr testcase and it SIGSEGVs.
Here is minimal example:
import unittest
import sys
class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
def test_file_fault(self):
# Testing sys.stdout is changed in getattr...
test_stdout = sys.stdout
class StdoutG
On 05/09/2012 05:13 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 08.05.2012 18:52:
Vitja Makarov wrote:
def partial_validity():
"""
>>> partial_validity()
('str object', 'double', 'str object')
"""
a_1 = 1.0
b = a_1 + 2 # definitely double
a_2 = 'test'
c = a_2 + 'to
On 9 May 2012 16:13, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 08.05.2012 18:52:
>> Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> def partial_validity():
>>> """
>>> >>> partial_validity()
>>> ('str object', 'double', 'str object')
>>> """
>>> a_1 = 1.0
>>> b = a_1 + 2 # definitely double
>>> a_2 =
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 08.05.2012 18:52:
> Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> def partial_validity():
>> """
>> >>> partial_validity()
>> ('str object', 'double', 'str object')
>> """
>> a_1 = 1.0
>> b = a_1 + 2 # definitely double
>> a_2 = 'test'
>> c = a_2 + 'toast' # definitely str
>> r
mark florisson, 09.05.2012 15:18:
> On 9 May 2012 14:16, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> from cython cimport typeof
>>
>> def foo(float[::1] a):
>>b = a
>>#del b
>>print typeof(b)
>>print typeof(a)
>>
>>
>> In this example `b` is inferred as 'Python object' and not
>> `float[::1]`, is that
Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 15:16:
> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov:
On 9 May 2012 13:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov:
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel:
>>> def test():
>>> x = 1# inferred as int
>>> del x# error: Deletion of non-Python, non-C++ object
>
On 9 May 2012 14:16, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
>>> 2012/5/9 mark florisson :
On 9 May 2012 13:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
Vitja has
2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2012/5/9 mark florisson :
>>> On 9 May 2012 13:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
>>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
>
2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
> 2012/5/9 mark florisson :
>> On 9 May 2012 13:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
>
> On a related note, is this
2012/5/9 mark florisson :
> On 9 May 2012 13:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
>>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
On a related note, is this fixable now?
def test(
On 9 May 2012 13:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
>>>
>>> On a related note, is this fixable now?
>>>
>>> def test():
>>> x = 1 # inferred as i
2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov :
> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
>>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
>>
>> On a related note, is this fixable now?
>>
>> def test():
>> x = 1 # inferred as int
>> del x # error: Deletion of non-Python,
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
>
> On a related note, is this fixable now?
>
> def test():
> x = 1 # inferred as int
> del x # error: Deletion of non-Python, non-C++ object
>
> http://trac.cyth
mark florisson, 06.05.2012 16:28:
> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready,
> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time
> for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what
> extent pypy support works, what works and what d
Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24:
> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow
On a related note, is this fixable now?
def test():
x = 1# inferred as int
del x# error: Deletion of non-Python, non-C++ object
http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/768
It migh
Stefan Behnel, 06.05.2012 20:22:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 06.05.2012 19:51:
>> On 05/06/2012 04:28 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready,
>>> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time
>>> for a 0.17 release? I th
Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 10:51:
> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>>
>> I think it's close enough to be released. I'll try to get around to list
>> the changes in the release notes (and maybe even ad
Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>
> I think it's close enough to be released. I'll try to get around to list
> the changes in the release notes (and maybe even add a note about alpha
> quality PyPy sup
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 10:21:
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 09:43:
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
>> I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
>>
>> https://github.com/cytho
mark florisson, 09.05.2012 10:37:
> On 9 May 2012 09:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 09:43:
>>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
> I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
>
> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit
On 9 May 2012 09:28, mark florisson wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 09:02, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:12:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/8 Stefan Behnel:
>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the cont
On 9 May 2012 09:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 09:43:
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/a40112b0461eae5ab22fbdd07ae798d4a72ff523
Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 10:21:
> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 09:43:
>>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
> I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
>
> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/a40112b0461eae5ab2
On 9 May 2012 08:49, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>> I think it's close enough to be released.
>
> ... although one thing I just noticed is that the "numpy_memoryview" test
On 9 May 2012 07:41, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> 2012/5/8 mark florisson:
On 8 May 2012 19:36, mark florisson wrote:
> Ok, so for the bugfix release 0.16.1 I propose that everyone cherry
> picks
On 9 May 2012 09:02, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:12:
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2012/5/8 Stefan Behnel:
> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow, so I wonder if
> this will enable us
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 09:43:
>> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>>> Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/a40112b0461eae5ab22fbdd07ae798d4a72ff523
class C:
Vitja Makarov, 09.05.2012 09:43:
> 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
>> Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
>>> I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/a40112b0461eae5ab22fbdd07ae798d4a72ff523
>>>
>>> class C:
>>> pass
>>> print callable(C
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:12:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> 2012/5/8 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow, so I wonder if
this will enable us to properly infer this:
def partial_val
Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
> I think it's close enough to be released.
... although one thing I just noticed is that the "numpy_memoryview" test
is still disabled because it lead to crashes in rec
2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
>> I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
>>
>> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/a40112b0461eae5ab22fbdd07ae798d4a72ff523
>>
>> class C:
>> pass
>> print callable(C())
>>
>> It prints True optimized version
Vitja Makarov, 08.05.2012 13:27:
> I've noticed regression related to callable() optimization.
>
> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/a40112b0461eae5ab22fbdd07ae798d4a72ff523
>
> class C:
> pass
> print callable(C())
>
> It prints True optimized version checks ((obj)->ob_type->tp_call !
45 matches
Mail list logo
