Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
On 6 May 2012 20:41, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:28 AM, mark florisson > wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, >> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time >> for a 0.17 release? I think it

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:28 AM, mark florisson wrote: > Hey, > > I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, > after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time > for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what > extent pypy s

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
On 6 May 2012 19:38, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 06.05.2012 16:28: >> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, >> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time >> for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what >>

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
On 6 May 2012 19:29, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/5/6 Dag Sverre Seljebotn : >> On 05/06/2012 04:28 PM, mark florisson wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, >>> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time >>> for a

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 06.05.2012 16:28: > I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, > after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time > for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what > extent pypy support works, what works and what d

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/5/6 Dag Sverre Seljebotn : > On 05/06/2012 04:28 PM, mark florisson wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, >> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time >> for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also docu

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread Stefan Behnel
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 06.05.2012 19:51: > On 05/06/2012 04:28 PM, mark florisson wrote: >> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, >> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time >> for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document t

Re: [Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/06/2012 04:28 PM, mark florisson wrote: Hey, I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what extent pypy support works, what work

[Cython] 0.17

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
Hey, I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready, after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what extent pypy support works, what works and what doesn't. Stefan, since you added a la

Re: [Cython] Python array support (#113)

2012-05-06 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 06.05.2012 11:05: > On 6 May 2012 09:56, mark florisson wrote: >> On 5 May 2012 20:50, Stefan Behnel wrote: https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/113 >>> >>> This looks ok to me now. There have been objections back when we discussed >>> the initial patch for array.array suppo

Re: [Cython] Python array support (#113)

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
On 6 May 2012 10:05, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 06.05.2012 10:56: >> On 5 May 2012 20:50, Stefan Behnel wrote:   https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/113 >>> >>> This looks ok to me now. There have been objections back when we discussed >>> the initial patch for array.array suppo

Re: [Cython] Python array support (#113)

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
On 6 May 2012 09:56, mark florisson wrote: > On 5 May 2012 20:50, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>>   https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/113 >> >> This looks ok to me now. There have been objections back when we discussed >> the initial patch for array.array support, so what do you think about >> mergi

Re: [Cython] Python array support (#113)

2012-05-06 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 06.05.2012 10:56: > On 5 May 2012 20:50, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/113 >> >> This looks ok to me now. There have been objections back when we discussed >> the initial patch for array.array support, so what do you think about >> merging this in?

Re: [Cython] Python array support (#113)

2012-05-06 Thread mark florisson
On 5 May 2012 20:50, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>   https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/113 > > This looks ok to me now. There have been objections back when we discussed > the initial patch for array.array support, so what do you think about > merging this in? > > Stefan > __

Re: [Cython] Python array support (#113)

2012-05-06 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Stefan Behnel, 05.05.2012 21:50: >>>   https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/113 >> >> This looks ok to me now. There have been objections back when we discussed >> the initial patch for array.array support, so what do you think about >> merg