Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Brevity, especially if the signature is inlined. (Encoding could take
care of this by, e.g. ignoring the redundant opening, or we could just
write di=d.)
Yes, I was thinking in terms of replacing the paren with
some other character, rather than inserting more parens.
--
Stefan Behnel wrote:
It wasn't really a proposed syntax, I guess, more of a way to write down an
example.
That's okay, although you might want to mention in the PEP
that the actual syntax is yet to be determined. Being a PEP,
anything it says tends to come across as being a specification
other
Hopefully a final release candidate for the 0.16 release can be found
here: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16 . This corresponds to
the 'release' branch of the cython repository on github.
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http:
On 15 April 2012 12:40, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 15.04.2012 13:30:
>> Finally, what are the semantics for Py_buffer? Will the callee own the
>> buffer, or will it borrow it? If they will borrow, then the compiler
>> will have to figure out whether it will need to own it (or be slower
mark florisson, 15.04.2012 13:30:
> Finally, what are the semantics for Py_buffer? Will the callee own the
> buffer, or will it borrow it? If they will borrow, then the compiler
> will have to figure out whether it will need to own it (or be slower
> and always own it), and acquire the buffer throu
On 15 April 2012 07:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 14.04.2012 23:15:
>> On 14 April 2012 22:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
* TBD: Support for Cython-specific constructs like memoryview slices
(so that arrays with strides and shape can
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 04/15/2012 09:30 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 15.04.2012 08:58:
Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> Do you really think it complicates the spec? SHA-1 is pretty
>standard, and
>> Python ships with hashlib (the hashing part isn't performance
>critical).
>>
>> I prefer hashing to string-interning as it can
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 04/15/2012 09:30 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 15.04.2012 08:58:
>>>
>>> Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
>>>
>>> On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
thanks for writing
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Do you really think it complicates the spec? SHA-1 is pretty standard, and
> Python ships with hashlib (the hashing part isn't performance critical).
>
> I prefer hashing to string-interning as it can still be done compile-time
> etc.
On 04/15/2012 10:07 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 04/15/2012 09:30 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 15.04.2012 08:58:
Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read thr
On 04/15/2012 09:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
Dag Sverre
On 04/15/2012 09:30 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 15.04.2012 08:58:
Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
ea
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Al Danial wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:38 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>>
>> Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
>> the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
>> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16
>
>> If there are an
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
>
>
> On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
>>
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
>
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 15.04.2012 08:58:
> Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
>
> On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
>>
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
>>> each described by a function point
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 08:32:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 07:59:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
> There may be a lot of promotion/demotion (y
17 matches
Mail list logo
